An applicant who does not meet the provisions of subdivision 36-24-17.3(4) or (5) may be issued a license to practice as an audiologist pending board approval if the applicant demonstrates the following:

(1) Has formally and consistently represented oneself to the public as an audiologist;

Ask a business law question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified business lawyers.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In South Dakota Codified Laws 36-24-17.4

  • written: include typewriting and typewritten, printing and printed, except in the case of signatures, and where the words are used by way of contrast to typewriting and printing. See South Dakota Codified Laws 2-14-2

(2) Has a master’s or doctorate degree in audiology from a regionally accredited educational institution;

(3) Has spent the majority of working hours in the practice of audiology;

(4) Passed any board designated written or oral exam for applicants who have not met subdivision 36-24-17.3(5);

(5) Submits an application on a form prescribed by the board by January 1, 1998; and

(6) Pays the application fee set by the board not to exceed three hundred fifty dollars.

Source: SL 1997, ch 221, § 27.