Maine Revised Statutes Title 33 Sec. 478 – Judicial actions
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
1. Action or intervention. An action affecting a conservation easement may be brought or intervened in by:
A. An owner of an interest in the real property burdened by the easement; [PL 1985, c. 395, §3 (NEW).]
B. A holder of the easement; [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).]
C. A person having a 3rd-party right of enforcement; or [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).]
D. The Attorney General; except that the Attorney General may initiate action seeking enforcement of a conservation easement only when the parties designated as having the right to do so under the terms of the conservation easement:
(1) Are no longer in legal existence;
(2) Are bankrupt or insolvent;
(3) Cannot be contacted after reasonable diligence to do so; or
(4) After 90 days’ prior written notice by the Attorney General of the nature of the asserted failure, have failed to take reasonable actions to bring about compliance with the conservation easement. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).]
[PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).]
Terms Used In Maine Revised Statutes Title 33 Sec. 478
- Amendment: A proposal to alter the text of a pending bill or other measure by striking out some of it, by inserting new language, or both. Before an amendment becomes part of the measure, thelegislature must agree to it.
- Conservation easement: means a nonpossessory interest of a holder in real property imposing limitations or affirmative obligations the purposes of which include retaining or protecting natural, scenic or open space values of real property; assuring its availability for agricultural, forest, recreational or open space use; protecting natural resources; or maintaining or enhancing air or water quality of real property. See Maine Revised Statutes Title 33 Sec. 476
- Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
- Equitable: Pertaining to civil suits in "equity" rather than in "law." In English legal history, the courts of "law" could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy. See damages. A separate court of "equity" could order someone to do something or to cease to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a trial by jury is normally available in "law" cases but not in "equity" cases. Source: U.S. Courts
- Holder: means :
A. See Maine Revised Statutes Title 33 Sec. 476Injunction: An order of the court prohibiting (or compelling) the performance of a specific act to prevent irreparable damage or injury. Real property: Land, and all immovable fixtures erected on, growing on, or affixed to the land. Real property: includes without limitation surface waters. See Maine Revised Statutes Title 33 Sec. 476
2. Intervention only. An action affecting a conservation easement may be intervened in by a political subdivision of the State in which the real property burdened by the easement is located, in accordance with court rules for permissive intervention.
[PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).]
3. Power of court. The court may permit termination of a conservation easement or approve amendment to a conservation easement that materially detracts from the conservation values it serves, as provided in section 477?A, subsection 2, paragraph B, and may enforce a conservation easement by injunction or proceeding at law and in equity. A court may deny equitable enforcement of a conservation easement only when it finds that change of circumstances has rendered that easement no longer in the public interest or no longer serving the publicly beneficial conservation purposes identified in the conservation easement. If the court so finds, the court may allow damages as the only remedy in an action to enforce the easement.
[PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).]
4. Confidentiality of records. Documents and records obtained by the Attorney General, which would otherwise not legally be subject to public disclosure, may be shared with other public agencies but must be held as legally confidential under Title 1, section 402, unless disclosed in the course of a public proceeding in court.
[PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).]
No comparative economic test may be used to determine under this subchapter if a conservation easement is in the public interest or serves a publicly beneficial conservation purpose. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 395, §3 (NEW). PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).