Subdivision 1.Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

An employee, former employee, or prospective employee of the state who is aggrieved by the state’s violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, United States Code, title 29, § 621, et seq., as amended, may bring a civil action against the state in federal court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction for such legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes of the act.

Subd. 2.Fair Labor Standards Act.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 1.05

  • Equitable: Pertaining to civil suits in "equity" rather than in "law." In English legal history, the courts of "law" could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy. See damages. A separate court of "equity" could order someone to do something or to cease to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a trial by jury is normally available in "law" cases but not in "equity" cases. Source: U.S. Courts
  • Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
  • state: extends to and includes the District of Columbia and the several territories. See Minnesota Statutes 645.44

An employee of the state who is aggrieved by the state’s violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, United States Code, title 29, § 201, et seq., as amended, may bring a civil action against the state in federal court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction for such legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes of the act.

Subd. 3.Family and Medical Leave Act.

An employee, former employee, or prospective employee of the state who is aggrieved by the state’s violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, United States Code, title 29, §§ 2601 to 2654, as amended, may bring a civil action against the state in federal court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction for such legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes of the act.

Subd. 4.Americans with Disabilities Act.

An employee, former employee, or prospective employee of the state who is aggrieved by the state’s violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, United States Code, title 42, § 12101, as amended, may bring a civil action against the state in federal court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction for such legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes of the act.

Subd. 5.Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).

An employee, former employee, or prospective employee of the state who is aggrieved by the state’s violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, United States Code, title 38, §§ 4301 to 4333, as amended, may bring a civil action against the state in federal court or another court of competent jurisdiction for legal or equitable relief that will effectuate the purposes of that act.