7. a. Notwithstanding the debarment pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1983, c.392 (C. 13:1E-133) or the conviction of any person required to be listed in a disclosure statement, or otherwise shown to have a beneficial interest in the business of an applicant, permittee or licensee, or business concern that has been issued a soil and fill recycling license or to have rented or leased at any or no cost real property, vehicles or other equipment used for the collection, transportation, treatment, processing, storage, brokering, transfer, or disposal of solid waste or hazardous waste, or the provision of soil and fill recycling services, to the applicant, the permittee, or the licensee, or the business concern that has been issued a soil and fill recycling license, for any of the crimes enumerated in subsection b. of section 8 of P.L.1983, c.392 (C. 13:1E-133), the department may issue or renew a license or a soil and fill recycling license to an applicant, permittee or licensee, or business concern that has been issued a soil and fill recycling license if the department determines in a writing setting forth findings of fact that the debarred or convicted person has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to the provisions of this section. If the department determines that the nature and seriousness of the debarment or crime creates a reasonable doubt that an applicant, permittee, or licensee, or business concern that has been issued a soil and fill recycling license will engage in the activity for which a license or soil and fill recycling license is sought in a lawful and responsible manner, the department shall make a determination in a writing setting forth findings of fact that the debarred or convicted person cannot affirmatively demonstrate rehabilitation.

b. In determining whether a debarred or convicted individual has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation, the department shall request a recommendation thereon from the Attorney General, which recommendation shall be in writing, and based upon a consideration of at least the following factors:

(1) The nature and responsibilities of the position which a debarred or convicted individual would hold;

(2) The nature and seriousness of the debarment or crime;

(3) The circumstances under which the debarment was imposed or the crime was committed;

(4) The date of the debarment or crime;

(5) The age of the debarred or convicted individual when the cause of debarment or crime took place;

(6) Whether the cause of the debarment or crime was an isolated or repeated event or act;

(7) Any evidence of good conduct in the community, counseling or psychiatric treatment received, acquisition of additional academic or vocational schooling, or the recommendation of persons who have supervised the debarred or convicted individual since the debarment or conviction; and

(8) The full criminal record of the debarred or convicted individual, any record of civil or regulatory violations or notices or any complaints alleging any such civil or regulatory violations, or any other allegations of wrongdoing.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, a convicted individual shall have affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation pursuant to the provisions of this section if the convicted individual produces evidence of a pardon issued by the Governor of this or any other state, or evidence of the expungement of every conviction for any of the crimes enumerated in subsection b. of section 8 of P.L.1983, c.392 (C. 13:1E-133).

c. In determining whether a debarred or convicted business concern has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation, the department shall request a recommendation thereon from the Attorney General, which recommendation shall be in writing, and based upon a consideration of at least the following factors:

(1) The nature and seriousness of the debarment or crime;

(2) The circumstances under which the debarment was imposed or the crime was committed;

(3) The date of the debarment or crime;

(4) Whether the cause of debarment or crime was an isolated or repeated event or act; and

(5) The full criminal record of the debarred or convicted business concern, any record of civil or regulatory violations or notices or any complaints alleging any such civil or regulatory violations, or any other allegations of wrongdoing.

d. The Attorney General may require, as a predicate to a determination that a debarred or convicted business concern has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation, that the debarred or convicted business concern agree, in writing, to an investigation of the debarment, crime or crimes committed by the debarred or convicted business concern which caused disqualification pursuant to subsection b. of section 8 of P.L.1983, c.392 (C. 13:1E-133), the persons involved in the debarment or crime, and any corporate policies, procedures, and organizational structure that may have led to the debarment or crime. At the conclusion of this investigation a report shall be prepared identifying the underlying conduct giving rise to the debarment or any criminal convictions and any steps that have subsequently been taken by the debarred or convicted business concern to prevent a recurrence of the acts leading to debarment or criminal activity, and recommending any steps that may be deemed necessary to prevent a recurrence of the acts leading to debarment or criminal activity. The investigation shall be conducted by, or on behalf of, the Attorney General, and the cost thereof shall be borne by the debarred or convicted business concern.

The Attorney General may require, on the basis of this investigation and as a condition of recommending that a debarred or convicted business concern has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation, that a debarred or convicted business concern comply, or agree in writing to comply, with any of the following:

(1) changes in the debarred or convicted business concern’s organizational structure to reduce the opportunity and motivation of individual employees to engage in criminal activity, including procedures for informing employees of the requirements of relevant state and federal law;

(2) changes in the debarred or convicted business concern’s long and short term planning to ensure that the debarred or convicted business concern implements procedures and policies to prevent future violations of the law;

(3) changes in the debarred or convicted business concern’s legal, accounting, or other internal or external control and monitoring procedures to discourage or prevent future violations of state or federal law;

(4) changes in the debarred or convicted business concern’s ownership, control, personnel, and personnel selection practices, including the removal of any person shown to have a beneficial interest in the debarred or convicted business concern, and the imposition of a reward or disincentive system in order to encourage employees to comply with relevant state and federal law;

(5) post-licensing monitoring of the debarred or convicted business concern’s activities relating to any changes in policy, procedure, or structure required by the Attorney General pursuant to this subsection, the cost of such monitoring to be borne by the debarred or convicted business concern; and

(6) any other requirements deemed necessary by the Attorney General.

e. The department shall not determine that a debarred or convicted business concern has affirmatively demonstrated rehabilitation if the debarred or convicted business concern has not complied, or agreed in writing to comply, with every requirement imposed by the Attorney General pursuant to subsection d. of this section.

L.1991, c.269, s.7; amended 2019, c.397, s.8.