New Jersey Statutes 13:20-33. Highlands permitting review program
Terms Used In New Jersey Statutes 13:20-33
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- person: includes corporations, companies, associations, societies, firms, partnerships and joint stock companies as well as individuals, unless restricted by the context to an individual as distinguished from a corporate entity or specifically restricted to one or some of the above enumerated synonyms and, when used to designate the owner of property which may be the subject of an offense, includes this State, the United States, any other State of the United States as defined infra and any foreign country or government lawfully owning or possessing property within this State. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
- State: extends to and includes any State, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia and the Canal Zone. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
b. The Highlands permitting review program established pursuant to this section shall include:
(1) a provision that may allow for a waiver of any provision of a Highlands permitting review on a case-by-case basis if determined to be necessary by the department in order to protect public health and safety;
(2) a provision that may allow for a waiver of any provision of a Highlands permitting review on a case-by-case basis for redevelopment in certain previously developed areas in the preservation area identified by the council pursuant to subsection b. of section 9 or subparagraph (h) of paragraph (6) of subsection a. of section 11 of this act; and
(3) a provision that may allow for a waiver of any provision of the Highlands permitting review on a case-by-case basis in order to avoid the taking of property without just compensation.
The grant of a waiver pursuant to this subsection by the department shall be conditioned upon the department’s determination that the major Highlands development meets the requirements prescribed for a finding as listed in subsection a. of section 36 of this act to the maximum extent possible.
c. The waiver provisions of subsection b. of this section are limited to the provisions of the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to section 34 of this act, and shall not limit the department’s jurisdiction or authority pursuant to any other provision of law, or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto, that is incorporated into the Highlands permitting review program.
d. The Highlands permitting review program established pursuant to this section may provide for the issuance of a general permit, provided that the department adopts rules and regulations which identify the activities subject to general permit review and establish the criteria for the approval or disapproval of a general permit.
e. Any person proposing to construct or cause to be constructed, or to undertake or cause to be undertaken, as the case may be, a major Highlands development in the preservation area shall file an application for a Highlands permitting review with the department, on forms and in a manner prescribed by the department.
f. The department shall, in accordance with a fee schedule adopted as a rule or regulation, establish and charge reasonable fees necessary to meet the administrative costs of the department associated with the processing, review, and enforcement of any application for a Highlands permitting review. These fees shall be deposited in the “Environmental Services Fund,” established pursuant to section 5 of P.L.1975, c.232 (C. 13:1D-33), and kept separate and apart from all other State receipts and appropriated only as provided herein. There shall be appropriated annually to the department revenue from that fund sufficient to defray in full the costs incurred in the processing, review, and enforcement of applications for Highlands permitting reviews.
L.2004,c.120,s.35.