Missouri Laws 454.603 – Health benefit plan may be required — terms — order of coverage — liability ..
1. At any state of a proceeding in which the circuit court or the division has jurisdiction to establish or modify an order for child support, including but not limited to actions brought pursuant to this chapter, chapters 210, 211, and 452, the court or the division shall determine whether to require a parent to provide medical care for the child through a health benefit plan.
2. The court or the division may require that a child be covered under a health benefit plan that is accessible to the child. Such a requirement shall be imposed in any IV-D case. The court or division shall require that a child be covered under a private health benefit plan whenever such a health benefit plan is available at reasonable cost through a parent’s employer or union. If a private health benefit plan is not available at reasonable cost through an employer or union, the court, in determining whether to require a parent to provide such coverage, shall consider:
Terms Used In Missouri Laws 454.603
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Obligation: An order placed, contract awarded, service received, or similar transaction during a given period that will require payments during the same or a future period.
- State: when applied to any of the United States, includes the District of Columbia and the territories, and the words "United States" includes such district and territories. See Missouri Laws 1.020
(1) The best interests of the child;
(2) The child’s present and anticipated needs for medical care;
(3) The financial ability of the parents to afford the cost of a health benefit plan; and
(4) The extent to which the cost of the health benefit plan is subsidized or reduced by participation on a group basis or otherwise.
3. To the extent that such options are available under the terms of the health benefit plan, an order may specify required terms of the health benefit plan, including:
(1) Minimum required policy limits;
(2) Minimum required coverage;
(3) Maximum terms for deductibles or required co-payments; or
(4) Other significant terms, including, but not limited to, any provision required for a health benefit plan under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
4. If the child is not covered by a private health benefit plan but such a plan is available to one of the parents at a reasonable cost, the court or the division shall order that coverage under the health benefit plan be provided for the child, unless there is available to the other parent a private health benefit plan with comparable or better benefits at comparable or reduced cost. If private health benefit plans are available to both parents upon terms which provide comparable benefits and costs, the court or the division shall determine which health benefit plan, if any, shall be required, giving due regard to the possible advantages of each plan.
5. The court shall require the obligor to be liable for all or a portion of the medical or dental expenses of the minor child that are not covered by the required health benefit plan coverage if:
(1) The court finds that the health benefit plan coverage required to be obtained by the obligor or available to the obligee does not pay all the reasonable and necessary medical or dental expenses of the minor child; and
(2) The court finds that the obligor has the financial resources to contribute to the payment of these medical or dental expenses; and
(3) The court finds the obligee has substantially complied with the terms of the health benefit coverage.
6. The cost of health benefit plan employee contributions or premiums shall not be a direct offset to child support awards established pursuant to this chapter, chapters 210, 211, and 452, but it shall be considered when determining the amount of child support to be paid by the obligor.
7. If two or more health benefit plans are available to one or both parents that are complementary to one another or are compatible as primary and secondary coverage for the child, the court or the division may order each parent to maintain one or more health benefit plans for the child.
8. Prior to terminating enrollment in a health benefit plan or changing from one health benefit plan to another, consideration by the court or division shall be given to the child’s medical condition and best interests and whether there is reason to believe that a new health benefit plan would omit or limit benefits because of a preexisting condition.
9. An abatement of a parent’s child support obligation shall not automatically abate that parent’s duty to provide for the child’s health care needs. Unless an order of the court or the division specifically provides for abatement or termination of health care coverage, an order to maintain health benefits or otherwise provide for a child’s health care needs shall continue in force until further order of the court or the division, or until the child’s right to parental support terminates.