Utah Code 63A-16-903. Chief information officer review and approval of technology proposals
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) The chief information officer shall review and evaluate each technology proposal that the review board transmits to the chief information officer.
Terms Used In Utah Code 63A-16-903
- Chief information officer: means the chief information officer appointed under Section 63A-16-201. See Utah Code 63A-16-102
- Division: means the Division of Technology Services. See Utah Code 63A-16-102
- Process: means a writ or summons issued in the course of a judicial proceeding. See Utah Code 68-3-12.5
- Review board: means the Architecture Review Board established within the department. See Utah Code 63A-16-901
- Technology proposal: means a proposal to implement a technology innovation designed to result in a greater efficiency in a government process or a cost saving in the delivery of a government service, or both. See Utah Code 63A-16-901
(2) The chief information officer may approve and recommend that the division provide funding from legislative appropriations for a technology proposal if, after the chief information officer’s review and evaluation of the technology proposal:
(2)(a) the chief information officer determines that there is a reasonably good likelihood that the technology proposal:
(2)(a)(i) is capable of being implemented effectively; and
(2)(a)(ii) will result in greater efficiency in a government process or a cost saving in the delivery of a government service, or both; and
(2)(b) the chief information officer receives approval from the governor’s budget office for the technology proposal.
(3) The chief information officer may:
(3)(a) prioritize multiple approved technology proposals based on their relative likelihood of achieving the goals described in Subsection (2); and
(3)(b) recommend funding based on the chief information officer’s prioritization under Subsection (3)(a).
(4) The division shall:
(4)(a) track the implementation and success of a technology proposal approved by the chief information officer;
(4)(b) evaluate the level of the technology proposal’s implementation effectiveness and whether the implementation results in greater efficiency in a government process or a cost saving in the delivery of a government service, or both; and
(4)(c) report the results of the division’s tracking and evaluation:
(4)(c)(i) to the chief information officer, as frequently as the chief information officer requests; and
(4)(c)(ii) at least annually to the Government Operations Interim Committee.
(5) The division may expend money appropriated by the Legislature to pay for expenses incurred by executive branch agencies in implementing a technology proposal that the chief information officer has approved.