23 USC 124 – Bridge investment program
(a)
(1)
(A)
(B)
(i) a bundle of projects described in subparagraph (A), regardless of whether the bundle of projects meets the requirements of section 144(j)(5); and
(ii) a project to replace or rehabilitate culverts for the purpose of improving flood control and improved habitat connectivity for aquatic species.
(2)
(3)
Terms Used In 23 USC 124
- Budget authority: Authority provided by law to enter into obligations that will result in outlays of Federal funds. Budget authority may be classified by the period of availability (one-year, multiyear, no-year), by the timing of congressional action (current or permanent), or by the manner of determining the amount available (definite or indefinite).
- Fiscal year: The fiscal year is the accounting period for the government. For the federal government, this begins on October 1 and ends on September 30. The fiscal year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends; for example, fiscal year 2006 begins on October 1, 2005 and ends on September 30, 2006.
- individual: shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. See 1 USC 8
- Obligation: An order placed, contract awarded, service received, or similar transaction during a given period that will require payments during the same or a future period.
- Real property: Land, and all immovable fixtures erected on, growing on, or affixed to the land.
- State: means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States. See 1 USC 7
(b)
(1)
(2)
(A) to improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of the movement of people and freight over bridges;
(B) to improve the condition of bridges in the United States by reducing—
(i) the number of bridges—
(I) in poor condition; or
(II) in fair condition and at risk of falling into poor condition within the next 3 years;
(ii) the total person miles traveled over bridges—
(I) in poor condition; or
(II) in fair condition and at risk of falling into poor condition within the next 3 years;
(iii) the number of bridges that—
(I) do not meet current geometric design standards; or
(II) cannot meet the load and traffic requirements typical of the regional transportation network; and
(iv) the total person miles traveled over bridges that—
(I) do not meet current geometric design standards; or
(II) cannot meet the load and traffic requirements typical of the regional transportation network; and
(C) to provide financial assistance that leverages and encourages non-Federal contributions from sponsors and stakeholders involved in the planning, design, and construction of eligible projects.
(c)
(1)
(2)
(A) in the case of a large project, in an amount that is—
(i) adequate to fully fund the project (in combination with other financial resources identified in the application); and
(ii) not less than $50,000,000; and
(B) in the case of any other eligible project, in an amount that is—
(i) adequate to fully fund the project (in combination with other financial resources identified in the application); and
(ii) not less than $2,500,000.
(3)
(A) in the case of a large project, not more than 50 percent; and
(B) in the case of any other eligible project, not more than 80 percent.
(4)
(A)
(B)
(i) Federal assistance other than a grant under the program may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of a project; and
(ii) notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the total Federal assistance provided for the project shall not exceed 90 percent of the total eligible project costs.
(C)
(5)
(A)
(i) in the case of a large project, the ratings assigned under subsection (g)(5)(A);
(ii) in the case of an eligible project other than a large project, the quality rating assigned under subsection (f)(3)(A)(ii);
(iii) the average daily person and freight throughput supported by the eligible project;
(iv) the number and percentage of bridges within the same State as the eligible project that are in poor condition;
(v) the extent to which the eligible project demonstrates cost savings by bundling multiple bridge projects;
(vi) in the case of an eligible project of a Federal land management agency, the extent to which the grant would reduce a Federal liability or Federal infrastructure maintenance backlog;
(vii) geographic diversity among grant recipients, including the need for a balance between the needs of rural and urban communities; and
(viii) the extent to which a bridge that would be assisted with a grant—
(I) is, without that assistance—
(aa) at risk of falling into or remaining in poor condition; or
(bb) in fair condition and at risk of falling into poor condition within the next 3 years;
(II) does not meet current geometric design standards based on—
(aa) the current use of the bridge; or
(bb) load and traffic requirements typical of the regional corridor or local network in which the bridge is located; or
(III) does not meet current seismic design standards.
(B)
(i) give priority to an application for an eligible project that is located within a State for which—
(I) 2 or more applications for eligible projects within the State were submitted for the current fiscal year and an average of 2 or more applications for eligible projects within the State were submitted in prior fiscal years of the program; and
(II) fewer than 2 grants have been awarded for eligible projects within the State under the program;
(ii) during the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2026, for each State described in clause (i), select—
(I) not fewer than 1 large project that the Secretary determines is justified under the evaluation under subsection (g)(4); or
(II) 2 eligible projects that are not large projects that the Secretary determines are justified under the evaluation under subsection (f)(3); and
(iii) not be required to award a grant for an eligible project that the Secretary does not determine is justified under an evaluation under subsection (f)(3) or (g)(4).
(6)
(d)
(1) A State or a group of States.
(2) A metropolitan planning organization that serves an urbanized area (as designated by the Bureau of the Census) with a population of over 200,000.
(3) A unit of local government or a group of local governments.
(4) A political subdivision of a State or local government.
(5) A special purpose district or public authority with a transportation function.
(6) A Federal land management agency.
(7) A Tribal government or a consortium of Tribal governments.
(8) A multistate or multijurisdictional group of entities described in paragraphs (1) through (7).
(e)
(1) in the case of a large project, the Secretary recommends for funding in the annual report on funding recommendations under subsection (g)(6), except as provided in subsection (g)(1)(B);
(2) is reasonably expected to begin construction not later than 18 months after the date on which funds are obligated for the project; and
(3) is based on the results of preliminary engineering.
(f)
(1)
(A)
(i) for the first fiscal year for which funds are made available for obligation under the program, not later than 60 days after the date on which the template under subparagraph (B)(i) is developed, and in subsequent fiscal years, not later than 60 days after the date on which amounts are made available for obligation under the program, solicit grant applications for eligible projects other than large projects; and
(ii) not later than 120 days after the date on which the solicitation under clause (i) expires, conduct evaluations under paragraph (3).
(B)
(i) develop a template for applicants to use to summarize project needs and benefits, including benefits described in paragraph (3)(B)(i); and
(ii) enable applicants to use data from the National Bridge Inventory under section 144(b) to populate templates described in clause (i), as applicable.
(2)
(3)
(A)
(i) conduct an evaluation of each eligible project for which an application is received under this subsection; and
(ii) assign a quality rating to the eligible project on the basis of the evaluation under clause (i).
(B)
(i) consider information on project benefits submitted by the applicant using the template developed under paragraph (1)(B)(i), including whether the project will generate, as determined by the Secretary—
(I) costs avoided by the prevention of closure or reduced use of the bridge to be improved by the project;
(II) in the case of a bundle of projects, benefits from executing the projects as a bundle compared to as individual projects;
(III) safety benefits, including the reduction of accidents and related costs;
(IV) person and freight mobility benefits, including congestion reduction and reliability improvements;
(V) national or regional economic benefits;
(VI) benefits from long-term resiliency to extreme weather events, flooding, or other natural disasters;
(VII) benefits from protection (as described in section 133(b)(10)), including improving seismic or scour protection;
(VIII) environmental benefits, including wildlife connectivity;
(IX) benefits to nonvehicular and public transportation users;
(X) benefits of using—
(aa) innovative design and construction techniques; or
(bb) innovative technologies; or
(XI) reductions in maintenance costs, including, in the case of a federally-owned bridge, cost savings to the Federal budget; and
(ii) consider whether and the extent to which the benefits, including the benefits described in clause (i), are more likely than not to outweigh the total project costs.
(g)
(1)
(A)
(B)
(2)
(A) all necessary information required for the Secretary to evaluate the large project; and
(B) information sufficient for the Secretary to determine that—
(i) the large project meets the applicable requirements under this section; and
(ii) there is a reasonable likelihood that the large project will continue to meet the requirements under this section.
(3)
(A) the eligible entity that submitted the application;
(B) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and
(C) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
(4)
(A) addresses a need to improve the condition of the bridge, as determined by the Secretary, consistent with the goals of the program under subsection (b)(2);
(B) will generate, as determined by the Secretary—
(i) costs avoided by the prevention of closure or reduced use of the bridge to be improved by the project;
(ii) in the case of a bundle of projects, benefits from executing the projects as a bundle compared to as individual projects;
(iii) safety benefits, including the reduction of accidents and related costs;
(iv) person and freight mobility benefits, including congestion reduction and reliability improvements;
(v) national or regional economic benefits;
(vi) benefits from long-term resiliency to extreme weather events, flooding, or other natural disasters;
(vii) benefits from protection (as described in section 133(b)(10)), including improving seismic or scour protection;
(viii) environmental benefits, including wildlife connectivity;
(ix) benefits to nonvehicular and public transportation users;
(x) benefits of using—
(I) innovative design and construction techniques; or
(II) innovative technologies; or
(xi) reductions in maintenance costs, including, in the case of a federally-owned bridge, cost savings to the Federal budget;
(C) is cost effective based on an analysis of whether the benefits and avoided costs described in subparagraph (B) are expected to outweigh the project costs;
(D) is supported by other Federal or non-Federal financial commitments or revenues adequate to fund ongoing maintenance and preservation; and
(E) is consistent with the objectives of an applicable asset management plan of the project sponsor, including a State asset management plan under section 119(e) in the case of a project on the National Highway System that is sponsored by a State.
(5)
(A)
(i) paragraph (4)(B);
(ii) paragraph (4)(C); and
(iii) paragraph (4)(D).
(B)
(C)
(i) paragraph (4)(B);
(ii) paragraph (4)(C); and
(iii) paragraph (4)(D).
(6)
(A)
(i) a list of large projects that have requested a recommendation for funding under a new grant agreement from funds anticipated to be available to carry out this subsection in the next fiscal year;
(ii) the evaluation under paragraph (4) and ratings under paragraph (5) for each project referred to in clause (i);
(iii) the grant amounts that the Secretary recommends providing to large projects in the next fiscal year, including—
(I) scheduled payments under previously signed multiyear grant agreements under subsection (j);
(II) payments for new grant agreements, including single-year grant agreements and multiyear grant agreements; and
(III) a description of how amounts anticipated to be available for the program from the Highway Trust Fund for that fiscal year will be distributed; and
(iv) for each project for which the Secretary recommends a new multiyear grant agreement under subsection (j), the proposed payout schedule for the project.
(B)
(i)
(ii)
(I) may recommend for funding in an annual report under this paragraph a large project using funds from the general fund of the Treasury; but
(II) shall not execute a grant agreement for that project unless—
(aa) funds other than from the Highway Trust Fund have been made available for the project; and
(bb) the Secretary determines that the project can be completed using funds other than from the Highway Trust Fund that are anticipated to be available in future fiscal years.
(C)
(i) consider the amount of funds available in future fiscal years for multiyear grant agreements as described in subparagraph (B); and
(ii) assume the availability of funds in future fiscal years for multiyear grant agreements that extend beyond the period of authorization based on the amount made available for large projects under the program in the last fiscal year of the period of authorization.
(D)
(i) the amount of the grant requested; and
(ii) grants for an eligible project for 1 bridge compared to an eligible project that is a bundle of projects.
(h)
(1) development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities;
(2) construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to the land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements directly related to improving system performance; and
(3) expenses related to the protection (as described in section 133(b)(10)) of a bridge, including seismic or scour protection.
(i)
(j)
(1)
(2)
(A) establish the terms of participation by the Federal Government in the project;
(B) establish the maximum amount of Federal financial assistance for the project in accordance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (c);
(C) establish a payout schedule for the project that provides for disbursement of the full grant amount by not later than 4 fiscal years after the fiscal year in which the initial amount is provided;
(D) determine the period of time for completing the project, even if that period extends beyond the period of an authorization; and
(E) attempt to improve timely and efficient management of the project, consistent with all applicable Federal laws (including regulations).
(3)
(A)
(i) shall obligate an amount of available budget authority specified in law; and
(ii) may include a commitment, contingent on amounts to be specified in law in advance for commitments under this paragraph, to obligate an additional amount from future available budget authority specified in law.
(B)
(C)
(i)
(ii)
(4)
(A) may use funds made available to the eligible entity under this title for eligible project costs of the large project until the amount specified in the multiyear grant agreement for the project for that fiscal year becomes available for obligation; and
(B) if the eligible entity uses funds as described in subparagraph (A), the funds used shall be reimbursed from the amount made available under the multiyear grant agreement for the project.
(k)
(1)
(A) before the applicant carries out the activity, the Secretary approves through a letter to the applicant the activity in the same manner as the Secretary approves other activities as eligible under the program;
(B) a record of decision, a finding of no significant impact, or a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) has been issued for the eligible project; and
(C) the activity is carried out without Federal assistance and in accordance with all applicable procedures and requirements.
(2)
(A)
(B)
(3)
(A) constitute an obligation of the Federal Government; or
(B) alter or influence any evaluation under subsection (f)(3)(A)(i) or (g)(4) or any recommendation by the Secretary for funding under the program.
(l)
(1)
(A) shall consider options to divest the bridge to a State or local entity after completion of the project; and
(B) may apply jointly with the State or local entity to which the bridge may be divested.
(2)
(m)
(n)
(1) an evaluation and justification for the eligible project; and
(2) the amount of the proposed grant.
(o)
(1)
(2)
(A) conduct an assessment of the administrative establishment, solicitation, selection, and justification process with respect to the funding of grants under the program; and
(B) submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that describes—
(i) the adequacy and fairness of the process under which each eligible project that received a grant under the program was selected; and
(ii) the justification and criteria used for the selection of each eligible project.
(p)
(1)
(2)
(q)
(1)
(A) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;
(B) $18,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;
(C) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;
(D) $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; and
(E) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.
(2)