Arizona Laws 38-1134. Internal investigations; employee representative; polygraph examination
A. If an employer interviews a probation officer in the course of an administrative investigation and the employer or probation officer reasonably believes that the interview could result in dismissal, demotion or suspension:
Terms Used In Arizona Laws 38-1134
- Action: includes any matter or proceeding in a court, civil or criminal. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- commission: means any office, board or commission of the state, or any political subdivision thereof, the salary or compensation of the incumbent or members of which is paid from a fund raised by taxation or by public revenue. See Arizona Laws 38-101
- Disciplinary action: means the dismissal, the demotion or any suspension of a probation officer that is authorized by statute, charter or ordinance and that is subject to a hearing or other procedure by a local merit board, a civil service board or a hearing officer. See Arizona Laws 38-1131
- Dismissal: The dropping of a case by the judge without further consideration or hearing. Source:
- including: means not limited to and is not a term of exclusion. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Person: includes a corporation, company, partnership, firm, association or society, as well as a natural person. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Probation: A sentencing alternative to imprisonment in which the court releases convicted defendants under supervision as long as certain conditions are observed.
- Probation officer: means a surveillance officer, juvenile detention officer or juvenile or adult probation officer, other than a probationary employee, who is employed by this state or a political subdivision of this state. See Arizona Laws 38-1131
1. The probation officer may request to have a representative of the officer present at no cost to the employer during the interview. The probation officer shall select a representative who is available on reasonable notice so that the interview is not unreasonably delayed. The representative shall participate in the interview only as an observer. Unless agreed to by the employer, the representative shall not be an attorney and shall be from the same agency except that if a representative from the same agency is not reasonably available, with the employer’s permission, the probation officer’s representative may be from the probation officer’s professional membership organization. The probation officer shall be permitted reasonable breaks of limited duration during any interview for telephonic or in person consultation with authorized persons, including an attorney, who are immediately available. An employer shall not discipline, retaliate against or threaten to retaliate against a probation officer for requesting that a representative be present or for acting as the representative of a probation officer pursuant to this paragraph.
2. Before the commencement of any interview described in this section, the employer shall provide the probation officer with a written notice informing the officer of the alleged facts that are the basis of the investigation, the specific nature of the investigation, the officer’s status in the investigation, all known allegations of misconduct that are the reason for the interview and the officer’s right to have a representative present at the interview. The notice shall include copies of all complaints that contain the alleged facts that are reasonably available, except for copies of complaints that are filed with the employer and that include allegations of unlawful discrimination, harassment or retaliation or complaints that involve matters under the jurisdiction of the equal employment opportunity commission.
3. At the conclusion of the interview, the probation officer is entitled to a period of time to consult with the officer’s representative and may make a statement not to exceed five minutes addressing specific facts or policies that are related to the interview.
B. Subsection A of this section does not require the employer to either:
1. Stop an interview to issue another notice for allegations based on information provided by the probation officer during the interview.
2. Disclose any fact to the probation officer or the probation officer’s representative that would impede the investigation.
C. Subsection A, paragraphs 1 and 2 of this section do not apply to an interview of a probation officer that is:
1. In the normal course of duty, counseling or instruction or an informal verbal admonishment by, or other routine or unplanned contact with, a supervisor or any other probation officer.
2. Preliminary questioning to determine the scope of the allegations or if an investigation is necessary.
3. Conducted during the course of a criminal investigation.
4. Conducted during the course of a polygraph examination.
D. An employer may require the probation officer to submit to a polygraph examination if the officer makes a statement to the employer during the investigation that differs from other information relating to the investigation that is known to the employer and reconciling that difference is necessary to complete the investigation. If a polygraph examination is administered pursuant to this subsection, the employer or the person administering the polygraph examination shall make an audio recording of the complete polygraph procedure and provide a copy of the recording to the probation officer. Section 38-1137 applies to a polygraph examination that is administered pursuant to this subsection.
E. If after an employer completes an investigation of a probation officer the employer seeks disciplinary action, at the request of the probation officer, the employer shall provide a basic summary of any discipline ordered against any other probation officer of generally similar rank and experience employed by the employer within the previous two years for the same or a similar violation. As an alternative, the employer may provide file copies of the relevant disciplinary cases. The employer shall not take final action and the employer shall not schedule a hearing until the basic summary or file copies are provided to the probation officer. This subsection does not apply if court rule prohibits the release of file copies of disciplinary cases.