Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. This section shall not be construed to mean that evidence of the existence of available third-party benefits is inadmissible.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; ss. 6, 22, ch. 78-361