Florida Regulations 64E-5.640: Dosimetry Equipment Used With Remote Afterloading Units, Teletherapy Units, or Gamma Stereotactic Radiosurgery Units
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) Except for low dose-rate remote afterloader source output or where the activity is determined by the manufacturer, a licensee shall have a dosimetry system available for use calibrated by paragraph (a) or (b), below.
(a) The system must have been calibrated using a system or source traceable to the NIST and published protocols accepted by nationally recognized bodies; or by a calibration laboratory accredited by the AAPM. The calibration must have been performed within the previous 2 years and after any servicing that may have affected system calibration.
(b) The system shall have been calibrated within the previous 4 years and shall have been intercompared 18 to 30 months after the calibration at an intercomparison meeting with another dosimetry system that has been calibrated within the previous 2 years by the NIST or by a calibration laboratory accredited by the AAPM. The intercomparison meeting shall be sanctioned by a calibration laboratory or radiologic physics center accredited by the AAPM. The calibration factor of the licensee’s system shall not have changed by more than 2 percent. The licensee shall not use the intercomparison result to change the calibration factor. When intercomparing dosimetry systems to be used for calibrating sealed sources for therapeutic units, the licensee shall use a comparable unit with beam attenuators or collimators, as applicable, and sources of the same radionuclide as the source used at the licensee’s facility.
(2) The licensee shall have available for use a dosimetry system for spot-check measurements. The spot-check system shall be the same system used to meet the requirement in subsection 64E-5.640(1), F.A.C., or shall be a system that has been compared with a system that has been calibrated as provided in subsection 64E-5.640(1), F.A.C. This comparison shall have been performed within the previous year and after each servicing that may have affected system calibration.
(3) The licensee shall maintain a record of each calibration, intercomparison, and comparison for the duration of the license. For each calibration, intercomparison, or comparison, the record shall include:
(a) The date, the manufacturer’s name, model numbers and serial numbers of the instruments that were calibrated, intercompared, or compared as required by subsections 64E-5.640(1) and (2), F.A.C.;
(b) The correction factors that were determined;
(c) The names of the individuals who performed the calibration, intercomparison, or comparison; and
Rulemaking Authority 404.022, 404.051, 404.061, 404.071, 404,081, 404.141 FS. Law Implemented 404.022, 404.051(1), (4), (5), (6), (8), (9), (10), (11), 404.061(2), (3), 404.071(1), 404.081, 404.141 FS. History-New 8-25-91, Formerly 10D-91.759, Amended 2-11-10.
(b) The system shall have been calibrated within the previous 4 years and shall have been intercompared 18 to 30 months after the calibration at an intercomparison meeting with another dosimetry system that has been calibrated within the previous 2 years by the NIST or by a calibration laboratory accredited by the AAPM. The intercomparison meeting shall be sanctioned by a calibration laboratory or radiologic physics center accredited by the AAPM. The calibration factor of the licensee’s system shall not have changed by more than 2 percent. The licensee shall not use the intercomparison result to change the calibration factor. When intercomparing dosimetry systems to be used for calibrating sealed sources for therapeutic units, the licensee shall use a comparable unit with beam attenuators or collimators, as applicable, and sources of the same radionuclide as the source used at the licensee’s facility.
(2) The licensee shall have available for use a dosimetry system for spot-check measurements. The spot-check system shall be the same system used to meet the requirement in subsection 64E-5.640(1), F.A.C., or shall be a system that has been compared with a system that has been calibrated as provided in subsection 64E-5.640(1), F.A.C. This comparison shall have been performed within the previous year and after each servicing that may have affected system calibration.
(3) The licensee shall maintain a record of each calibration, intercomparison, and comparison for the duration of the license. For each calibration, intercomparison, or comparison, the record shall include:
(a) The date, the manufacturer’s name, model numbers and serial numbers of the instruments that were calibrated, intercompared, or compared as required by subsections 64E-5.640(1) and (2), F.A.C.;
(b) The correction factors that were determined;
(c) The names of the individuals who performed the calibration, intercomparison, or comparison; and
Rulemaking Authority 404.022, 404.051, 404.061, 404.071, 404,081, 404.141 FS. Law Implemented 404.022, 404.051(1), (4), (5), (6), (8), (9), (10), (11), 404.061(2), (3), 404.071(1), 404.081, 404.141 FS. History-New 8-25-91, Formerly 10D-91.759, Amended 2-11-10.