Florida Regulations 69V-40.00112: Effect of Law Enforcement Records on Applications for Loan Originator, Mortgage Broker, and Mortgage Lender Licensure.
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) General Procedure Regarding Law Enforcement Records. For the purposes of this rule each loan originator applicant and each control person of a mortgage broker and mortgage lender license applicant shall be referred to collectively as “”relevant persons.”” If the mortgage broker or mortgage lender license applicant is a natural person, he or she is a relevant person under this rule. As part of the application review process, the Office is required to consider a relevant person’s law enforcement record when deciding whether to approve an application for licensure as a loan originator, mortgage broker, or mortgage lender. When conducting this review, the Office reviews the relevant person’s Form MU2 or MU4 (NMLS Individual Form) responses and criminal history information derived from the fingerprint check. In the event of a question regarding the relevant person’s criminal history, the Office will request additional information from the relevant person to determine the status of a criminal event, the specific facts and circumstances surrounding a criminal event, or to address other issues determined to be relevant to the review of the law enforcement record. The Office will notify the applicant of any specific documents that it requires in order to complete its review. The requested documents must be legible. Documentation that is typically requested includes:
(a) A copy of the police arrest affidavit, arrest report or similar document.
(b) A certified copy of the charges.
(c) A certified copy of the plea, judgment, and sentence where applicable.
(d) A certified copy of an order of entry into pre-trial intervention, and the order of termination of pre-trial intervention showing dismissal of charges where applicable.
(e) A certified copy of an order of termination of probation or supervised release, if applicable. If the requested documentation cannot be obtained, the relevant person shall submit evidence of that fact in order for the application to be deemed complete. Evidence that documentation cannot be obtained shall consist of a written statement on the letterhead of the agency that would be the custodian of the documents, signed by a representative of that agency, stating that they have no record of such matter, or that the record is lost or was damaged or destroyed, or otherwise stating why the document cannot be produced.
(2) Classification of Crimes.
(a) The Office makes a general classification of crimes into four classes: A, B, C and D as listed in subsections (13), (14), (15), and (16) of this rule.
(b) These classifications reflect the Office’s evaluation of various crimes in terms of moral turpitude and the seriousness of the crime as such factors relate to the prospective threat to public welfare typically posed by a person who would commit such a crime.
(c) The names and descriptions of crimes, as set out in the classification of crimes, are intended to serve only as generic names or descriptions of crimes and shall not be read as legal titles of crimes, or as limiting the included crimes bearing the exact name or description stated.
(d) For purposes of this rule, “”trigger date”” means the date on which an applicant was found guilty, or pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere to a crime.
(e) A charge in the nature of attempt or intent to commit a crime, or conspiracy to commit a crime, is classified the same as the crime itself.
(3) Effect on Licensure of Commitment of Single Crime. The Office finds it necessary to implement the following standards for applications with a relevant person whose law enforcement record includes a single crime, subject to the mitigating factors set forth in this rule before licensure. All periods referenced in this rule run from the trigger date.
(a) Class A Crime. The applicant is not eligible for licensure.
(b) Class B Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 15 years have passed since the trigger date.
(c) Class C Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 7 years have passed since the trigger date.
(d) Class D Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 5 years have passed since the trigger date.
(4) Applicants With Multiple Crimes.
(a) The Office requires that applications with a relevant person whose law enforcement record includes multiple class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crimes, or any combination thereof, wait longer than those whose law enforcement record includes only a single crime before becoming eligible for licensure in order to assure that such applicant’s greater inability or unwillingness to abide by the law has been overcome. Therefore, the Office finds it necessary that a longer disqualifying period be utilized in such instances, before licensure can safely be granted. Accordingly, where the relevant person has been found guilty or pled guilty or pled nolo contendere to more than one crime, the Office shall add 5 years to the disqualifying period for each additional crime.
(b) The additional periods are added to the disqualifying period for the most serious class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crime, and the combined total disqualifying period then runs from the trigger date of the most recent class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crime.
(c) Classification as “”Single Crime”” versus “”Multiple Crimes.”” For the purposes of this rule, two (2) or more offenses are considered a single crime if they are based on the same act or transaction or on two (2) or more connected acts or transactions.
(5) Mitigating Factors.
(a) The disqualifying period for a Class “”B”” crime shall be shortened upon proof of one or more of the following factors. When more than one factor is present the applicant is entitled to add together all of the applicable mitigation amounts and deduct that total from the usual disqualifying period, provided that an applicant shall not be permitted an aggregate mitigation of more than three (3) years for the following factors:
1. One year is deducted if the probation officer or prosecuting attorney in the most recent crime states in a signed writing that the probation officer or prosecuting attorney believes the relevant person would pose no significant threat to public welfare if the applicant is licensed as a loan originator, mortgage broker, or mortgage lender.
2. One year is deducted if restitution or settlement has been made for all crimes in which restitution or settlement was ordered by the court, and proof of such restitution or settlement is shown in official court documents or as verified in a signed writing by the prosecuting attorney or probation officer.
3. One year will be deducted if the relevant person was under age 21 when the crime was committed and there is only one crime in the relevant person’s law enforcement record.
4. One year is deducted if the applicant furnishes proof that the relevant person was at the time of the crime addicted to drugs or suffering active alcoholism. The proof must be accompanied by a written letter from a properly licensed doctor, psychologist, or therapist licensed by a duly constituted state licensing body stating that the licensed person has examined or treated the applicant and that in his or her professional opinion the addiction or alcoholism is currently in remission and has been in remission for the previous 12 months. The professional opinion shall be dated within 45 days of the time of application.
5. Other Mitigating Factors. An applicant is permitted to submit any other evidence of facts that the applicant believes should decrease the disqualifying period before licensure is allowed and one additional year shall be deducted if the Office agrees the facts have a mitigating effect on the licensure decision.
(b) The burden is upon the applicant to establish these mitigating factors. Where the mitigating factor relates to or requires evidence of government agency or court action, it must be proved by a certified true copy of the agency or court document.
(6) Circumstances Not Constituting Mitigation. The Office finds that no mitigating weight exists, and none will be given, for the following factors:
(a) Type of Plea. The Office draws no distinction among types of plea, e.g., found guilty; pled guilty; pled nolo contendere.
(b) Collateral Attack on Criminal Proceedings. The Office will not allow or give any weight to an attempt to re-litigate, impeach, or collaterally attack judicial criminal proceedings or their results wherein the relevant person was found guilty or pled guilty or nolo contendere. Thus the Office will not hear or consider arguments such as: the criminal proceedings were unfair; the judge was biased; the witness or prosecutor lied or acted improperly; the defendant only pled guilty due to financial or mental stress; the defendant was temporarily insane at the time of the crime; or the defendant had ineffective counsel.
(c) Subjective Factors. The Office finds that subjective factors involving state of mind have no mitigating weight.
(7) Effect of Pending Appeal in Criminal Proceedings; Reversal on Appeal.
(a) The Office interprets the statutory grounds for denial of licensure as arising immediately upon a finding of guilt, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, regardless of whether an appeal is or is not allowed to be taken. The Office will not wait for the outcome of an appeal to deny licensure, unless a Florida court specifically stays the Office’s adverse action.
(b) If on appeal the conviction is reversed, the Office shall immediately drop the said crime as grounds for denial of licensure.
(8) Pre-Trial Intervention. If at the time of application a relevant person is participating in a pre-trial intervention program based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S., the Office will deny the application for license. The Office considers participation in a pre-trial intervention program to be a pending criminal prosecution under chapter 494, F.S., and finds it necessary to the public welfare to wait until final disposition of all charges of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S., before an application for licensure may be considered.
(9) Effect of Sealing or Expunging of Criminal Record.
(a) A relevant person is not required to disclose or acknowledge, and is permitted in fact to affirmatively deny, any arrest or criminal proceeding, the record of which has been legally and properly expunged or sealed by order of a court of competent jurisdiction prior to the time of application, and such denial or failure to disclose is not grounds for adverse action by the Office.
(b) Matters Sealed or Expunged Subsequent to Application. Occasionally a relevant person will have a matter sealed or expunged after an application has been filed, but before a licensing decision is made by the Office. In such situation the Office policy is as follows:
1. If the relevant person properly disclosed the matter on the application, and thereafter has the record sealed or expunged, the Office will not consider the matter in the application decision.
2. However, if the relevant person did not reveal the matter on the application and the matter had not been sealed or expunged at the time of making the application, the Office will construe the failure to disclose the matter on the application as a material misrepresentation or material misstatement, and the application shall be denied pursuant to chapter 494, F.S.
(10) Effect of Varying Terminology.
(a) With regard to the following six subparagraphs, the Office treats each phrase in a particular subparagraph as having the same effect as the other phrases in that same subparagraph:
1. Adjudicated guilty; convicted.
2. Found guilty; entered a finding of guilt.
3. Pled guilty; entered a plea of guilty; admitted guilt; admitted the charges.
4. Nolo contendere; no contest; did not contest; did not deny; no denial.
5. Adjudication of guilt withheld; adjudication withheld; no adjudication entered; entry of findings withheld; no official record to be entered; judgment withheld; judgment not entered.
6. Nolle prosse; nolle prosequi; charges withdrawn; charges dismissed; charges dropped.
(b) In all other instances the Office will look to the substantive meaning of the terminology used in the context in which it was used under the law of the jurisdiction where it was used.
(11) Imprisoned Persons and Community Supervision.
(a) Imprisonment. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this rule, the Office shall not license any applicant under chapter 494, F.S., while a relevant person is imprisoned, under arrest, or serving a sentence for any crime. Further, the Office shall not license any applicant when a relevant person has been released from imprisonment, based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of licensure under chapter 494, F.S., until the later of the period otherwise set out in the rules or five (5) years after the date of release. The Office finds it necessary that the person be released from imprisonment and thereafter demonstrate an ability to abide by the law by passage of at least five (5) years on good behavior, before licensure can be granted without undue risk to the public welfare. For the purposes of this section, the term “”imprisonment”” shall include confinement in a state or federal prison or county jail for a period of more than one year.
(b) Community Supervision. The Office shall not grant licensure when a relevant person who at the time of application or at any time during the pendency of the application is under supervision as the result of the commission or a criminal offense and released to the community under the jurisdiction of the courts, paroling authorities, correctional agencies, or other criminal justice agencies based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S.
(12) Effect of Disqualifying Periods. The disqualifying periods established in this rule do not give an applicant a right to licensure after any set period of time. Regardless of the expiration of any disqualifying period imposed by these rules, the burden to prove entitlement to licensure remains on the applicant.
(13) Class “”A”” Crimes include all felonies involving an act of fraud, dishonesty, or a breach of trust, or money laundering, and the Office finds that such crimes constitute crimes of moral turpitude. The Office finds the following list of crimes are Class “”A”” crimes. This list is representative only and shall not be construed to constitute a complete or exclusive list of all crimes that are Class “”A”” crimes. No inference should be drawn from the absence of any crime from this list.
(a) Any type of fraud, including but not limited to Fraud, Postal Fraud, Wire Fraud, Securities Fraud, Welfare Fraud, Defrauding the Government, Credit Card Fraud, Defrauding an Innkeeper, Passing worthless check(s) with intent to defraud.
(b) Perjury.
(c) Armed robbery.
(d) Robbery.
(e) Extortion.
(f) Bribery.
(g) Embezzlement.
(h) Grand Theft.
(i) Larceny.
(j) Burglary.
(k) Breaking and entering.
(l) Identity theft.
(m) Any type of forgery or uttering a forged instrument.
(n) Misuse of public office.
(o) Racketeering.
(p) Buying, receiving, concealing, possessing or otherwise dealing in stolen property.
(q) Treason against the United States, or a state, district, or territory thereof.
(r) Altering public documents.
(s) Witness tampering.
(t) Tax evasion.
(u) Impersonating or attempting to impersonate a law enforcement officer.
(v) Money Laundering.
(14) Class “”B”” Crimes include the following list of felonies, or similar felonies, and the Office finds that such crimes constitute crimes of moral turpitude.
(a) Murder in all degrees.
(b) Arson.
(c) Sale, importation, or distribution of controlled substances (drugs); or possession for sale, importation or distribution.
(d) Aggravated Assault (e.g., as with a deadly weapon).
(e) Aggravated Battery (e.g., as with a deadly weapon).
(f) Rape.
(g) Sexually molesting any minor.
(h) Sexual battery.
(i) Battery of or threatening a law enforcement office or public official in the performance of his/her duties.
(j) Kidnapping.
(k) Video Voyeurism.
(15) Class “”C”” Crimes include all felonies not Class “”A”” or Class “”B”” Crimes.
(16) Class “”D”” Crimes includes any misdemeanor that involves fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of moral turpitude.
(17) Foreign Law Enforcement Records. If a law enforcement record includes convictions, charges, or arrests outside the United States, the Office shall consider the following factors to reduce, eliminate, or apply a disqualifying period:
(a) Whether the crime in the criminal record would be a crime under the laws of the United States or any state within the United States;
(b) The degree of penalty associated with the same or similar crimes in the United States; and,
(c) The extent to which the foreign justice system provided safeguards similar to those provided criminal defendants under the Constitution of the United States; for example, the right of a defendant to a public trial, the right against self-incrimination, the right of notice of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel.
(18) For purposes of this rule, “”certified”” means that there must be a certification or attestation by the issuer of the record that the document is a true copy of a record contained in the issuer’s office and the issuer’s seal, if any.
(19) Forms MU2 or MU4 (NMLS Individual Form) are incorporated by reference in Fl. Admin. Code R. 69V-40.002
Rulemaking Authority 494.0011(2)(c), 494.00312(2)(h), 494.00313(1)(e), 494.00321(2)(f), 494.00322(1)(e), 494.00611(2)(h), 494.00612(1)(f) FS. Law Implemented 494.0011(2)(c), 494.00312, 494.00313, 494.00321, 494.00322, 494.00611, 494.00612 FS. History-New 10-1-10, Amended 11-9-15.
Terms Used In Florida Regulations 69V-40.00112
- Affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it, before a notary or officer having authority to administer oaths.
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Arrest: Taking physical custody of a person by lawful authority.
- Conviction: A judgement of guilt against a criminal defendant.
- Defendant: In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
- Dismissal: The dropping of a case by the judge without further consideration or hearing. Source:
- Embezzlement: In most states, embezzlement is defined as theft/larceny of assets (money or property) by a person in a position of trust or responsibility over those assets. Embezzlement typically occurs in the employment and corporate settings. Source: OCC
- Entitlement: A Federal program or provision of law that requires payments to any person or unit of government that meets the eligibility criteria established by law. Entitlements constitute a binding obligation on the part of the Federal Government, and eligible recipients have legal recourse if the obligation is not fulfilled. Social Security and veterans' compensation and pensions are examples of entitlement programs.
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Forgery: The fraudulent signing or alteration of another's name to an instrument such as a deed, mortgage, or check. The intent of the forgery is to deceive or defraud. Source: OCC
- Fraud: Intentional deception resulting in injury to another.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Mortgage: The written agreement pledging property to a creditor as collateral for a loan.
- Nolo contendere: No contest-has the same effect as a plea of guilty, as far as the criminal sentence is concerned, but may not be considered as an admission of guilt for any other purpose.
- Plea: In a criminal case, the defendant's statement pleading "guilty" or "not guilty" in answer to the charges, a declaration made in open court.
- Probation: A sentencing alternative to imprisonment in which the court releases convicted defendants under supervision as long as certain conditions are observed.
- Restitution: The court-ordered payment of money by the defendant to the victim for damages caused by the criminal action.
- Settlement: Parties to a lawsuit resolve their difference without having a trial. Settlements often involve the payment of compensation by one party in satisfaction of the other party's claims.
- Trial: A hearing that takes place when the defendant pleads "not guilty" and witnesses are required to come to court to give evidence.
(b) A certified copy of the charges.
(c) A certified copy of the plea, judgment, and sentence where applicable.
(d) A certified copy of an order of entry into pre-trial intervention, and the order of termination of pre-trial intervention showing dismissal of charges where applicable.
(e) A certified copy of an order of termination of probation or supervised release, if applicable. If the requested documentation cannot be obtained, the relevant person shall submit evidence of that fact in order for the application to be deemed complete. Evidence that documentation cannot be obtained shall consist of a written statement on the letterhead of the agency that would be the custodian of the documents, signed by a representative of that agency, stating that they have no record of such matter, or that the record is lost or was damaged or destroyed, or otherwise stating why the document cannot be produced.
(2) Classification of Crimes.
(a) The Office makes a general classification of crimes into four classes: A, B, C and D as listed in subsections (13), (14), (15), and (16) of this rule.
(b) These classifications reflect the Office’s evaluation of various crimes in terms of moral turpitude and the seriousness of the crime as such factors relate to the prospective threat to public welfare typically posed by a person who would commit such a crime.
(c) The names and descriptions of crimes, as set out in the classification of crimes, are intended to serve only as generic names or descriptions of crimes and shall not be read as legal titles of crimes, or as limiting the included crimes bearing the exact name or description stated.
(d) For purposes of this rule, “”trigger date”” means the date on which an applicant was found guilty, or pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere to a crime.
(e) A charge in the nature of attempt or intent to commit a crime, or conspiracy to commit a crime, is classified the same as the crime itself.
(3) Effect on Licensure of Commitment of Single Crime. The Office finds it necessary to implement the following standards for applications with a relevant person whose law enforcement record includes a single crime, subject to the mitigating factors set forth in this rule before licensure. All periods referenced in this rule run from the trigger date.
(a) Class A Crime. The applicant is not eligible for licensure.
(b) Class B Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 15 years have passed since the trigger date.
(c) Class C Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 7 years have passed since the trigger date.
(d) Class D Crime. The applicant will not be granted a license until 5 years have passed since the trigger date.
(4) Applicants With Multiple Crimes.
(a) The Office requires that applications with a relevant person whose law enforcement record includes multiple class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crimes, or any combination thereof, wait longer than those whose law enforcement record includes only a single crime before becoming eligible for licensure in order to assure that such applicant’s greater inability or unwillingness to abide by the law has been overcome. Therefore, the Office finds it necessary that a longer disqualifying period be utilized in such instances, before licensure can safely be granted. Accordingly, where the relevant person has been found guilty or pled guilty or pled nolo contendere to more than one crime, the Office shall add 5 years to the disqualifying period for each additional crime.
(b) The additional periods are added to the disqualifying period for the most serious class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crime, and the combined total disqualifying period then runs from the trigger date of the most recent class “”B,”” “”C,”” or “”D,”” crime.
(c) Classification as “”Single Crime”” versus “”Multiple Crimes.”” For the purposes of this rule, two (2) or more offenses are considered a single crime if they are based on the same act or transaction or on two (2) or more connected acts or transactions.
(5) Mitigating Factors.
(a) The disqualifying period for a Class “”B”” crime shall be shortened upon proof of one or more of the following factors. When more than one factor is present the applicant is entitled to add together all of the applicable mitigation amounts and deduct that total from the usual disqualifying period, provided that an applicant shall not be permitted an aggregate mitigation of more than three (3) years for the following factors:
1. One year is deducted if the probation officer or prosecuting attorney in the most recent crime states in a signed writing that the probation officer or prosecuting attorney believes the relevant person would pose no significant threat to public welfare if the applicant is licensed as a loan originator, mortgage broker, or mortgage lender.
2. One year is deducted if restitution or settlement has been made for all crimes in which restitution or settlement was ordered by the court, and proof of such restitution or settlement is shown in official court documents or as verified in a signed writing by the prosecuting attorney or probation officer.
3. One year will be deducted if the relevant person was under age 21 when the crime was committed and there is only one crime in the relevant person’s law enforcement record.
4. One year is deducted if the applicant furnishes proof that the relevant person was at the time of the crime addicted to drugs or suffering active alcoholism. The proof must be accompanied by a written letter from a properly licensed doctor, psychologist, or therapist licensed by a duly constituted state licensing body stating that the licensed person has examined or treated the applicant and that in his or her professional opinion the addiction or alcoholism is currently in remission and has been in remission for the previous 12 months. The professional opinion shall be dated within 45 days of the time of application.
5. Other Mitigating Factors. An applicant is permitted to submit any other evidence of facts that the applicant believes should decrease the disqualifying period before licensure is allowed and one additional year shall be deducted if the Office agrees the facts have a mitigating effect on the licensure decision.
(b) The burden is upon the applicant to establish these mitigating factors. Where the mitigating factor relates to or requires evidence of government agency or court action, it must be proved by a certified true copy of the agency or court document.
(6) Circumstances Not Constituting Mitigation. The Office finds that no mitigating weight exists, and none will be given, for the following factors:
(a) Type of Plea. The Office draws no distinction among types of plea, e.g., found guilty; pled guilty; pled nolo contendere.
(b) Collateral Attack on Criminal Proceedings. The Office will not allow or give any weight to an attempt to re-litigate, impeach, or collaterally attack judicial criminal proceedings or their results wherein the relevant person was found guilty or pled guilty or nolo contendere. Thus the Office will not hear or consider arguments such as: the criminal proceedings were unfair; the judge was biased; the witness or prosecutor lied or acted improperly; the defendant only pled guilty due to financial or mental stress; the defendant was temporarily insane at the time of the crime; or the defendant had ineffective counsel.
(c) Subjective Factors. The Office finds that subjective factors involving state of mind have no mitigating weight.
(7) Effect of Pending Appeal in Criminal Proceedings; Reversal on Appeal.
(a) The Office interprets the statutory grounds for denial of licensure as arising immediately upon a finding of guilt, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, regardless of whether an appeal is or is not allowed to be taken. The Office will not wait for the outcome of an appeal to deny licensure, unless a Florida court specifically stays the Office’s adverse action.
(b) If on appeal the conviction is reversed, the Office shall immediately drop the said crime as grounds for denial of licensure.
(8) Pre-Trial Intervention. If at the time of application a relevant person is participating in a pre-trial intervention program based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S., the Office will deny the application for license. The Office considers participation in a pre-trial intervention program to be a pending criminal prosecution under chapter 494, F.S., and finds it necessary to the public welfare to wait until final disposition of all charges of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S., before an application for licensure may be considered.
(9) Effect of Sealing or Expunging of Criminal Record.
(a) A relevant person is not required to disclose or acknowledge, and is permitted in fact to affirmatively deny, any arrest or criminal proceeding, the record of which has been legally and properly expunged or sealed by order of a court of competent jurisdiction prior to the time of application, and such denial or failure to disclose is not grounds for adverse action by the Office.
(b) Matters Sealed or Expunged Subsequent to Application. Occasionally a relevant person will have a matter sealed or expunged after an application has been filed, but before a licensing decision is made by the Office. In such situation the Office policy is as follows:
1. If the relevant person properly disclosed the matter on the application, and thereafter has the record sealed or expunged, the Office will not consider the matter in the application decision.
2. However, if the relevant person did not reveal the matter on the application and the matter had not been sealed or expunged at the time of making the application, the Office will construe the failure to disclose the matter on the application as a material misrepresentation or material misstatement, and the application shall be denied pursuant to chapter 494, F.S.
(10) Effect of Varying Terminology.
(a) With regard to the following six subparagraphs, the Office treats each phrase in a particular subparagraph as having the same effect as the other phrases in that same subparagraph:
1. Adjudicated guilty; convicted.
2. Found guilty; entered a finding of guilt.
3. Pled guilty; entered a plea of guilty; admitted guilt; admitted the charges.
4. Nolo contendere; no contest; did not contest; did not deny; no denial.
5. Adjudication of guilt withheld; adjudication withheld; no adjudication entered; entry of findings withheld; no official record to be entered; judgment withheld; judgment not entered.
6. Nolle prosse; nolle prosequi; charges withdrawn; charges dismissed; charges dropped.
(b) In all other instances the Office will look to the substantive meaning of the terminology used in the context in which it was used under the law of the jurisdiction where it was used.
(11) Imprisoned Persons and Community Supervision.
(a) Imprisonment. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this rule, the Office shall not license any applicant under chapter 494, F.S., while a relevant person is imprisoned, under arrest, or serving a sentence for any crime. Further, the Office shall not license any applicant when a relevant person has been released from imprisonment, based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of licensure under chapter 494, F.S., until the later of the period otherwise set out in the rules or five (5) years after the date of release. The Office finds it necessary that the person be released from imprisonment and thereafter demonstrate an ability to abide by the law by passage of at least five (5) years on good behavior, before licensure can be granted without undue risk to the public welfare. For the purposes of this section, the term “”imprisonment”” shall include confinement in a state or federal prison or county jail for a period of more than one year.
(b) Community Supervision. The Office shall not grant licensure when a relevant person who at the time of application or at any time during the pendency of the application is under supervision as the result of the commission or a criminal offense and released to the community under the jurisdiction of the courts, paroling authorities, correctional agencies, or other criminal justice agencies based upon a charge of criminal conduct that would authorize denial of a license under chapter 494, F.S.
(12) Effect of Disqualifying Periods. The disqualifying periods established in this rule do not give an applicant a right to licensure after any set period of time. Regardless of the expiration of any disqualifying period imposed by these rules, the burden to prove entitlement to licensure remains on the applicant.
(13) Class “”A”” Crimes include all felonies involving an act of fraud, dishonesty, or a breach of trust, or money laundering, and the Office finds that such crimes constitute crimes of moral turpitude. The Office finds the following list of crimes are Class “”A”” crimes. This list is representative only and shall not be construed to constitute a complete or exclusive list of all crimes that are Class “”A”” crimes. No inference should be drawn from the absence of any crime from this list.
(a) Any type of fraud, including but not limited to Fraud, Postal Fraud, Wire Fraud, Securities Fraud, Welfare Fraud, Defrauding the Government, Credit Card Fraud, Defrauding an Innkeeper, Passing worthless check(s) with intent to defraud.
(b) Perjury.
(c) Armed robbery.
(d) Robbery.
(e) Extortion.
(f) Bribery.
(g) Embezzlement.
(h) Grand Theft.
(i) Larceny.
(j) Burglary.
(k) Breaking and entering.
(l) Identity theft.
(m) Any type of forgery or uttering a forged instrument.
(n) Misuse of public office.
(o) Racketeering.
(p) Buying, receiving, concealing, possessing or otherwise dealing in stolen property.
(q) Treason against the United States, or a state, district, or territory thereof.
(r) Altering public documents.
(s) Witness tampering.
(t) Tax evasion.
(u) Impersonating or attempting to impersonate a law enforcement officer.
(v) Money Laundering.
(14) Class “”B”” Crimes include the following list of felonies, or similar felonies, and the Office finds that such crimes constitute crimes of moral turpitude.
(a) Murder in all degrees.
(b) Arson.
(c) Sale, importation, or distribution of controlled substances (drugs); or possession for sale, importation or distribution.
(d) Aggravated Assault (e.g., as with a deadly weapon).
(e) Aggravated Battery (e.g., as with a deadly weapon).
(f) Rape.
(g) Sexually molesting any minor.
(h) Sexual battery.
(i) Battery of or threatening a law enforcement office or public official in the performance of his/her duties.
(j) Kidnapping.
(k) Video Voyeurism.
(15) Class “”C”” Crimes include all felonies not Class “”A”” or Class “”B”” Crimes.
(16) Class “”D”” Crimes includes any misdemeanor that involves fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of moral turpitude.
(17) Foreign Law Enforcement Records. If a law enforcement record includes convictions, charges, or arrests outside the United States, the Office shall consider the following factors to reduce, eliminate, or apply a disqualifying period:
(a) Whether the crime in the criminal record would be a crime under the laws of the United States or any state within the United States;
(b) The degree of penalty associated with the same or similar crimes in the United States; and,
(c) The extent to which the foreign justice system provided safeguards similar to those provided criminal defendants under the Constitution of the United States; for example, the right of a defendant to a public trial, the right against self-incrimination, the right of notice of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel.
(18) For purposes of this rule, “”certified”” means that there must be a certification or attestation by the issuer of the record that the document is a true copy of a record contained in the issuer’s office and the issuer’s seal, if any.
(19) Forms MU2 or MU4 (NMLS Individual Form) are incorporated by reference in Fl. Admin. Code R. 69V-40.002
Rulemaking Authority 494.0011(2)(c), 494.00312(2)(h), 494.00313(1)(e), 494.00321(2)(f), 494.00322(1)(e), 494.00611(2)(h), 494.00612(1)(f) FS. Law Implemented 494.0011(2)(c), 494.00312, 494.00313, 494.00321, 494.00322, 494.00611, 494.00612 FS. History-New 10-1-10, Amended 11-9-15.