Sec. 5.5. (a) As used in this section, “attaching entity” means a cable operator (as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522(5)) that seeks an attachment, or has an attachment, to a pole.

     (b) As used in this section, “carrying charge factor”, or “ccf”, refers to the carrying charge factor, as described in subsection (i)(2)(B)(ii), that is used in calculating a pole attachment rental fee under subsection (i)(2)(B).

     (c) As used in this section, “net bare pole cost”, or “nbp”, refers to the average net cost of a bare pole to the pole owner, as described in subsection (i)(2)(B)(iii), that is used in calculating a pole attachment rental fee under subsection (i)(2)(B).

     (d) As used in this section, “pole” refers to an electric distribution pole.

     (e) As used in this section, “pole owner” means a:

(1) corporation organized under IC 8-1-13;

(2) corporation organized under IC 23-17 that is an electric cooperative and that has at least one (1) member that is a corporation organized under IC 8-1-13; or

(3) municipality providing electric service;

that owns or controls one (1) or more poles.

     (f) As used in this section, “space allocation factor”, or “saf”, with respect to a pole, means the quotient of:

(1) the space on the pole occupied by an attaching entity; divided by

(2) the usable space on the pole;

as described in subsection (i)(2)(B)(i), that is used in calculating a pole attachment rental fee under subsection (i)(2)(B).

     (g) Subject to subsections (h) through (s), a pole owner shall permit attachments by attaching entities to the poles owned or controlled by the pole owner.

     (h) A rate, term, or condition imposed by a pole owner for access to poles owned or controlled by the pole owner:

(1) must be nondiscriminatory, just, and reasonable; and

(2) must not favor:

(A) the pole owner or an affiliate of the pole owner; or

(B) any other entity with facilities attached to the pole.

     (i) Any pole attachment rental fee imposed by a pole owner for access to poles owned or controlled by the pole owner:

(1) must be calculated on an annual, per-pole basis; and

(2) is considered to provide reasonable compensation and to be nondiscriminatory, just, and reasonable if the fee:

(A) is agreed upon by the parties; or

(B) is not greater than the fee that would apply if the pole attachment rental fee were calculated by multiplying the following factors:

(i) Subject to subsection (j), the percentage of the total usable space that is occupied by the pole attachment.

(ii) The sum of the pole owner’s annual administrative, maintenance, and depreciation expenses, plus cost of debt.

(iii) The net bare pole cost.

Expressed mathematically:

(saf) times (ccf) times (nbp)

     (j) For purposes of determining the percentage of a pole’s usable space that is occupied by a pole attachment under subsection (i)(2)(B)(i):

(1) the usable space is presumed to be sixteen (16) feet, based on an average pole height of forty (40) feet; and

(2) the pole attachment is presumed to occupy two (2) feet of usable space;

resulting in a space allocation factor of twelve and one-half percent (12.5%).

     (k) If an attaching entity and a pole owner fail to agree upon:

(1) access to poles owned or controlled by the pole owner; or

(2) the rates, terms, and conditions for attachment to poles owned or controlled by the pole owner;

the attaching entity may apply to the commission for a determination of the matter.

     (l) Upon receiving a request for a determination under subsection (k), the commission shall:

(1) proceed to determine whether:

(A) the denial of access to one (1) or more poles was unlawful; or

(B) the rates, terms, and conditions complained of were not just and reasonable as determined under subsection (i)(2)(B);

as applicable; and

(2) issue an order:

(A) directing that access to the poles at issue be permitted; and

(B) prescribing for such access such rates, terms, conditions, and compensations that:

(i) are reasonable; and

(ii) comply with subsections (h) and (i).

     (m) In any case in which the commission issues an order under subsection (l):

(1) the access ordered by the commission under subsection (l)(2)(A) shall be permitted by the pole owner; and

(2) the rates, terms, conditions, and compensations prescribed by the commission under subsection (l)(2)(B) shall be observed, followed, and paid by the parties, as applicable;

subject to recourse to the courts upon the complaint of any interested party as provided in this chapter and in IC 8-1-3. Any order of the commission under subsection (l) may be revised by the commission from time to time upon application of any interested party or upon the commission’s own motion.

     (n) Any attachment to a pole may only be made with the written permission of the pole owner. If a contract does not exist between a pole owner and an attaching entity at the time an attachment is made, an attaching entity that violates this subsection shall pay a fine of five hundred dollars ($500) for each pole on which an unauthorized attachment is made.

     (o) An attachment to a utility pole made without notification to the pole owner and without the pole owner’s written authorization, as required by subsection (n), is considered to have been made on:

(1) the date of the most recent survey; or

(2) the date that is five (5) years before the date of first discovery of the unauthorized attachment by the pole owner;

whichever date is more recent. However, if the unauthorized pole attachment is discovered by survey, the unauthorized attachment is considered to have been made on the date of that survey.

     (p) A pole owner’s acceptance of payment for unauthorized pole attachments does not constitute a waiver of any other rights or remedies under an existing agreement or under any law.

     (q) An attaching entity that has been given written permission from a pole owner for an attachment to the pole owner’s pole is responsible for transferring the attachment not later than ninety (90) days after receiving written notice from the pole owner to do so. If:

(1) after the expiration of the ninety (90) day period described in this subsection; or

(2) after having been given as much notice as possible, in the case of an emergency;

the attaching entity has failed to rearrange or transfer the attaching entity’s system, or an applicable portion of that system, the pole owner may rearrange the system or portion of the system, transfer the system or portion of the system to one (1) or more substituted poles, or relocate the system or portion of the system, and the attaching entity shall reimburse the pole owner for the pole owner’s costs in doing so. However, this section does not relieve the attaching entity from maintaining adequate workforces readily at hand to handle the rearrangement, repair, service, or maintenance of the attaching entity’s attached system, or any portions of that system, in the event that the condition of the attached system, or any portion of the system, hinders the pole owner’s operations.

     (r) An attaching entity is primarily responsible for:

(1) scheduling; and

(2) coordinating directly with all other users of a pole;

all relocations required as part of any project of the attaching entity. The pole owner shall assist in coordinating the relocation of the attaching entity’s attachments or of other attachments to the pole owner’s poles whenever the relocation is caused by any project of the attaching entity. The attaching entity shall indemnify and hold harmless the pole owner from any loss or liability that is incurred or claimed by the attaching entity or the attaching entity’s contractor, and that arises from or is related to the failure of the pole owner to timely relocate a pole if that same attaching entity has not timely removed its attachment from the pole owner’s pole.

     (s) To the extent any provision set forth in this section conflicts with a provision in a contract in effect on July 1, 2021, the provision in the contract controls unless otherwise agreed to by the attaching entity and the pole owner.

As added by P.L.177-2021, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.9-2022, SEC.12.

   Sec. 5. (a) Notwithstanding any other law or rule adopted by the commission, except those cited, or rules adopted that pertain to those cited, in section 11 of this chapter, on the request of an energy utility electing to become subject to this section, the commission may enter an order, after notice and hearing, that the public interest requires the commission to commence an orderly process to decline to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction over either the energy utility or the retail energy service of the energy utility, or both.

     (b) In determining whether the public interest will be served, the commission shall consider the following:

(1) Whether technological or operating conditions, competitive forces, or the extent of regulation by other state or federal regulatory bodies render the exercise, in whole or in part, of jurisdiction by the commission unnecessary or wasteful.

(2) Whether the commission’s declining to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction will be beneficial for the energy utility, the energy utility’s customers, or the state.

(3) Whether the commission’s declining to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction will promote energy utility efficiency.

(4) Whether the exercise of commission jurisdiction inhibits an energy utility from competing with other providers of functionally similar energy services or equipment.

As added by P.L.108-1995, SEC.3.