Indiana Code 9-30-6-10. Judicial hearing; petition; issues; findings; county prosecutor to represent state; burden of proof; appeal
(1) in the court where the charges with respect to the person’s operation of a vehicle are pending; or
Terms Used In Indiana Code 9-30-6-10
- Affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it, before a notary or officer having authority to administer oaths.
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Attorney: includes a counselor or other person authorized to appear and represent a party in an action or special proceeding. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- in writing: include printing, lithographing, or other mode of representing words and letters. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
- Judgment: means all final orders, decrees, and determinations in an action and all orders upon which executions may issue. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Probable cause: A reasonable ground for belief that the offender violated a specific law.
- Verified: when applied to pleadings, means supported by oath or affirmation in writing. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
(b) The petition for review must:
(1) be in writing;
(2) be verified by the person seeking review; and
(3) allege specific facts that contradict the facts alleged in the probable cause affidavit.
(c) The hearing under this section shall be limited to the following issues:
(1) Whether the arresting law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe that the person was operating a vehicle in violation of IC 9-30-5.
(2) Whether the person refused to submit to a chemical test offered by a law enforcement officer.
(d) If the court finds:
(1) that there was no probable cause; or
(2) that the person’s driving privileges were suspended under section 9(b) of this chapter and that the person did not refuse to submit to a chemical test;
the court shall order the bureau to rescind the ignition interlock device requirement or reinstate the person’s driving privileges.
(e) The prosecuting attorney of the county in which a petition has been filed under this chapter shall represent the state on relation of the bureau with respect to the petition.
(f) The petitioner has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
(g) The court’s order is a final judgment appealable in the manner of civil actions by either party. The attorney general shall represent the state on relation of the bureau with respect to the appeal.
[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-11-4-10.]
As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.18. Amended by P.L.76-2004, SEC.13; P.L.2-2005, SEC.38.