Kentucky Statutes 160.346 – Definitions — Targeted and comprehensive support and improvement — Revised plans — Turnaround audit — Review and report — Intervention process — Reimbursement of district — Report required — Exit criteria — School…
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) For purposes of this section:
(a) “Approved turnaround vendor list” means a list of at least three (3) vendors pre-approved by the Kentucky Board of Education for the purposes of subsection (8) of this section that have documented success at providing turnaround diagnosis, training, and improved performance of organizations;
(b) “Department” means the Kentucky Department of Education;
(c) “ESSA” means the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95, or its successor;
(d) “Level” means elementary, middle, or high school;
(e) “Turnaround” means a comprehensive transformation of a school to achieve accelerated, meaningful, and sustainable increases in student achievement through improved school leadership and school district support;
(f) “Turnaround plan” means a mandatory school plan that is designed to improve student learning and performance with evidence-based interventions as defined in ESSA and that is developed and implemented by the local school district in partnership with stakeholders, including the principal, other school leaders, teachers, and parents; and
(g) “Turnaround team” means the turnaround training and support team described in subsection (8)(a) of this section.
(2) (a) Beginning with the 2020-2021 school year, and annually thereafter, the department shall identify a school for targeted support and improvement if the school has one (1) or more of the same subgroups, as defined by ESSA, whose performance in the state accountability system by level is at or below that of all students in any of the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools for three (3) consecutive years.
(b) Beginning with the 2021-2022 school year, and every three (3) years thereafter, the department shall identify a school for additional targeted support and improvement if the school has one (1) or more subgroups, as defined by ESSA, whose performance in the state accountability system by level is at or below the summative performance of all students in any of the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section and the school was identified in the immediately preceding year for targeted support and improvement as described in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
(3) Beginning with the 2021-2022 school year, and every three (3) years thereafter, a school shall be identified by the department for comprehensive support and improvement if the school is:
(a) In the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools in its level based on the school’s performance in the state accountability system;
(b) A high school with a four (4) year cohort graduation rate that is less than eighty percent (80%); or
(c) Identified by the department for additional targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(b) of this section and fails to exit additional targeted support and improvement status based on criteria established under subsection (11) of this section.
(4) (a) When a school is identified for targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(a) of this section, the local school personnel, working with stakeholders, including the principal, other school leaders, teachers, and parents, shall revise its school improvement plan, which shall be subject to review and approval by the local board of education.
(b) Each revised plan shall be informed by all available indicators, including student performance compared to long-term goals, and shall include:
1. Components of turnaround leadership development and support;
2. Identification of critical resource inequities;
3. Evidence-based interventions; and
4. Additional actions that address the causes of consistently underperforming subgroups of students.
(c) If adequate performance progress, as defined by the department, is not made, the local school district shall take additional action to assist and support the school in reaching performance goals.
(5) When a school is identified for additional targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(b) of this section, the local school district shall take more rigorous district-determined action to assist and support the school in reaching performance goals.
(6) (a) When a school is identified for comprehensive support and improvement, an audit shall be performed by the department to diagnose the causes of the school’s low performance.
(b) The audit conducted under this subsection shall be the only comprehensive audit required for a school unless the school fails to exit comprehensive support and improvement status as described in subsection (11) of this section or exits comprehensive support and improvement status but subsequently repeats as a school identified for comprehensive support and improvement.
(7) (a) The audit conducted by the department under subsection (6) of this section shall include:
1. A diagnosis of the causes of the school’s low performance, with an emphasis on underperforming subgroups of students and corresponding critical resource inequities;
2. An assessment and recommendation to the superintendent regarding the best strategies to address the school’s specific needs;
3. An assessment of the interaction and relationship among the superintendent, central office personnel, and the school principal;
4. A recommendation of the steps the school may implement to launch and sustain a turnaround process; and
5. A recommendation to the local board of education of the turnaround principles and strategies necessary for the superintendent to assist the school with turnaround.
(b) The report of an audit conducted under this subsection shall be provided to the superintendent, local board of education, school principal, commissioner of education, and the Kentucky Board of Education.
(8) After completion of the audit described in subsection (7) of this section, each school identified for comprehensive support and improvement shall engage in the following turnaround intervention process:
(a) The local board of education shall select a vendor from the approved turnaround vendor list to provide a turnaround training and support team to the school identified for comprehensive support and improvement. The local board of education shall negotiate the scope and duration of the vendor’s services;
(b) The authority of the school council granted under KRS § 160.345 shall be transferred to the superintendent;
(c) The superintendent shall select a principal for the school if a principal vacancy occurs. The superintendent shall consult with the turnaround team, parents, certified staff, and classified staff before appointing a principal replacement;
(d) Upon recommendation of the principal, the superintendent may reassign certified staff members to a comparable position in the school district;
(e) The superintendent shall collaborate with the turnaround team to design ongoing turnaround training and support for the principal and a corresponding monitoring system of effectiveness and student achievement results;
(f) The principal shall collaborate with the turnaround team to establish an advisory leadership team representing school stakeholders including other school leaders, teachers, and parents;
(g) 1. In consultation with the department, the local school board shall collaborate with the superintendent, principal, turnaround team, and the advisory leadership team to propose a three (3) year turnaround plan.
2. The turnaround plan shall include requests to the department for exemptions from submitting documentation that are identified by the principal, advisory leadership team, and turnaround team as inhibitors to investing time in innovative instruction and accelerated student achievement of diverse learners including ongoing staff instructional plans, student interventions, formative assessment results, or staff effectiveness processes.
3. The turnaround plan shall be reviewed for approval by the superintendent and the local board of education and shall be subject to
review, approval, monitoring, and periodic review by the department as described in KRS § 158.782;
(h) The school district may request technical assistance from the department for development and implementation of the turnaround plan, which may include conducting needs assessments, selecting evidence-based interventions, and reviewing and addressing resource inequities;
(i) The turnaround plan shall be fully implemented by the first full day of the school year following the school year the school was identified for comprehensive support and improvement; and
(j) The superintendent shall periodically report to the local school board, and at least annually to the commissioner of education, on the implementation and results of the turnaround plan.
(9) The department shall annually disburse funds to a school district, for a maximum of three (3) years, to assist with funding the turnaround vendor costs incurred by the district under subsection (8) of this section. The Kentucky Board of Education shall promulgate administrative regulations on how the disbursement amounts shall be determined, which shall be based on the department’s past practice for determining allocations for school improvement.
(10) Beginning in 2023, the department shall submit an annual report no later than November 30 to the Interim Joint Committee on Education relating to the turnaround vendor selected by each school under subsection (8) of this section. The report shall include but not be limited to each school’s accountability system performance since utilizing the services of the turnaround vendor, the cost of using the vendor, and any other information helpful in evaluating the performance of the turnaround vendor.
(11) The Kentucky Board of Education shall establish annual statewide exit criteria for schools identified for targeted support and improvement, additional targeted support and improvement, and comprehensive support and improvement.
(12) If a school enters comprehensive support and improvement status and does not make any annual improvement, as determined by the department, for two (2) consecutive years, or if the school does not exit the status after three (3) years, the school shall enter a school intervention process chosen by the commissioner of education that provides more rigorous support and action by the department to improve the school’s performance.
(13) For school districts that include a significant number of schools, as determined by the department, identified for targeted support and improvement:
(a) The department shall periodically review a local board’s resource allocations to support school improvement and provide technical assistance to the local school board; and
(b) The department may provide a recommended list of turnaround or school intervention providers that have demonstrated success implementing evidence-based strategies.
(14) If, in the course of a school audit, the audit team identifies information suggesting
that a violation of KRS § 160.345(9)(a) may have occurred, the commissioner of education shall forward the evidence to the Office of Education Accountability for investigation.
(15) A school’s right to establish a council granted under KRS § 160.345 may be restored by the local board of education two (2) years after the school exits comprehensive support and improvement status.
Effective: July 15, 2020
History: Amended 2020 Ky. Acts ch. 112, sec. 2, effective July 15, 2020. — Amended
2019 Ky. Acts ch. 199, sec. 3, effective June 27, 2019. — Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 156, sec. 12, effective April 10, 2017. — Amended 2012 Ky. Acts ch. 61, sec. 2, effective July 12, 2012. — Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 1, sec. 1, effective January
14, 2010. — Created 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 1, effective July 13, 2004.
(a) “Approved turnaround vendor list” means a list of at least three (3) vendors pre-approved by the Kentucky Board of Education for the purposes of subsection (8) of this section that have documented success at providing turnaround diagnosis, training, and improved performance of organizations;
Terms Used In Kentucky Statutes 160.346
- Action: includes all proceedings in any court of this state. See Kentucky Statutes 446.010
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- State: when applied to a part of the United States, includes territories, outlying possessions, and the District of Columbia. See Kentucky Statutes 446.010
- Year: means calendar year. See Kentucky Statutes 446.010
(b) “Department” means the Kentucky Department of Education;
(c) “ESSA” means the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95, or its successor;
(d) “Level” means elementary, middle, or high school;
(e) “Turnaround” means a comprehensive transformation of a school to achieve accelerated, meaningful, and sustainable increases in student achievement through improved school leadership and school district support;
(f) “Turnaround plan” means a mandatory school plan that is designed to improve student learning and performance with evidence-based interventions as defined in ESSA and that is developed and implemented by the local school district in partnership with stakeholders, including the principal, other school leaders, teachers, and parents; and
(g) “Turnaround team” means the turnaround training and support team described in subsection (8)(a) of this section.
(2) (a) Beginning with the 2020-2021 school year, and annually thereafter, the department shall identify a school for targeted support and improvement if the school has one (1) or more of the same subgroups, as defined by ESSA, whose performance in the state accountability system by level is at or below that of all students in any of the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools for three (3) consecutive years.
(b) Beginning with the 2021-2022 school year, and every three (3) years thereafter, the department shall identify a school for additional targeted support and improvement if the school has one (1) or more subgroups, as defined by ESSA, whose performance in the state accountability system by level is at or below the summative performance of all students in any of the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section and the school was identified in the immediately preceding year for targeted support and improvement as described in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
(3) Beginning with the 2021-2022 school year, and every three (3) years thereafter, a school shall be identified by the department for comprehensive support and improvement if the school is:
(a) In the lowest-performing five percent (5%) of all schools in its level based on the school’s performance in the state accountability system;
(b) A high school with a four (4) year cohort graduation rate that is less than eighty percent (80%); or
(c) Identified by the department for additional targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(b) of this section and fails to exit additional targeted support and improvement status based on criteria established under subsection (11) of this section.
(4) (a) When a school is identified for targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(a) of this section, the local school personnel, working with stakeholders, including the principal, other school leaders, teachers, and parents, shall revise its school improvement plan, which shall be subject to review and approval by the local board of education.
(b) Each revised plan shall be informed by all available indicators, including student performance compared to long-term goals, and shall include:
1. Components of turnaround leadership development and support;
2. Identification of critical resource inequities;
3. Evidence-based interventions; and
4. Additional actions that address the causes of consistently underperforming subgroups of students.
(c) If adequate performance progress, as defined by the department, is not made, the local school district shall take additional action to assist and support the school in reaching performance goals.
(5) When a school is identified for additional targeted support and improvement under subsection (2)(b) of this section, the local school district shall take more rigorous district-determined action to assist and support the school in reaching performance goals.
(6) (a) When a school is identified for comprehensive support and improvement, an audit shall be performed by the department to diagnose the causes of the school’s low performance.
(b) The audit conducted under this subsection shall be the only comprehensive audit required for a school unless the school fails to exit comprehensive support and improvement status as described in subsection (11) of this section or exits comprehensive support and improvement status but subsequently repeats as a school identified for comprehensive support and improvement.
(7) (a) The audit conducted by the department under subsection (6) of this section shall include:
1. A diagnosis of the causes of the school’s low performance, with an emphasis on underperforming subgroups of students and corresponding critical resource inequities;
2. An assessment and recommendation to the superintendent regarding the best strategies to address the school’s specific needs;
3. An assessment of the interaction and relationship among the superintendent, central office personnel, and the school principal;
4. A recommendation of the steps the school may implement to launch and sustain a turnaround process; and
5. A recommendation to the local board of education of the turnaround principles and strategies necessary for the superintendent to assist the school with turnaround.
(b) The report of an audit conducted under this subsection shall be provided to the superintendent, local board of education, school principal, commissioner of education, and the Kentucky Board of Education.
(8) After completion of the audit described in subsection (7) of this section, each school identified for comprehensive support and improvement shall engage in the following turnaround intervention process:
(a) The local board of education shall select a vendor from the approved turnaround vendor list to provide a turnaround training and support team to the school identified for comprehensive support and improvement. The local board of education shall negotiate the scope and duration of the vendor’s services;
(b) The authority of the school council granted under KRS § 160.345 shall be transferred to the superintendent;
(c) The superintendent shall select a principal for the school if a principal vacancy occurs. The superintendent shall consult with the turnaround team, parents, certified staff, and classified staff before appointing a principal replacement;
(d) Upon recommendation of the principal, the superintendent may reassign certified staff members to a comparable position in the school district;
(e) The superintendent shall collaborate with the turnaround team to design ongoing turnaround training and support for the principal and a corresponding monitoring system of effectiveness and student achievement results;
(f) The principal shall collaborate with the turnaround team to establish an advisory leadership team representing school stakeholders including other school leaders, teachers, and parents;
(g) 1. In consultation with the department, the local school board shall collaborate with the superintendent, principal, turnaround team, and the advisory leadership team to propose a three (3) year turnaround plan.
2. The turnaround plan shall include requests to the department for exemptions from submitting documentation that are identified by the principal, advisory leadership team, and turnaround team as inhibitors to investing time in innovative instruction and accelerated student achievement of diverse learners including ongoing staff instructional plans, student interventions, formative assessment results, or staff effectiveness processes.
3. The turnaround plan shall be reviewed for approval by the superintendent and the local board of education and shall be subject to
review, approval, monitoring, and periodic review by the department as described in KRS § 158.782;
(h) The school district may request technical assistance from the department for development and implementation of the turnaround plan, which may include conducting needs assessments, selecting evidence-based interventions, and reviewing and addressing resource inequities;
(i) The turnaround plan shall be fully implemented by the first full day of the school year following the school year the school was identified for comprehensive support and improvement; and
(j) The superintendent shall periodically report to the local school board, and at least annually to the commissioner of education, on the implementation and results of the turnaround plan.
(9) The department shall annually disburse funds to a school district, for a maximum of three (3) years, to assist with funding the turnaround vendor costs incurred by the district under subsection (8) of this section. The Kentucky Board of Education shall promulgate administrative regulations on how the disbursement amounts shall be determined, which shall be based on the department’s past practice for determining allocations for school improvement.
(10) Beginning in 2023, the department shall submit an annual report no later than November 30 to the Interim Joint Committee on Education relating to the turnaround vendor selected by each school under subsection (8) of this section. The report shall include but not be limited to each school’s accountability system performance since utilizing the services of the turnaround vendor, the cost of using the vendor, and any other information helpful in evaluating the performance of the turnaround vendor.
(11) The Kentucky Board of Education shall establish annual statewide exit criteria for schools identified for targeted support and improvement, additional targeted support and improvement, and comprehensive support and improvement.
(12) If a school enters comprehensive support and improvement status and does not make any annual improvement, as determined by the department, for two (2) consecutive years, or if the school does not exit the status after three (3) years, the school shall enter a school intervention process chosen by the commissioner of education that provides more rigorous support and action by the department to improve the school’s performance.
(13) For school districts that include a significant number of schools, as determined by the department, identified for targeted support and improvement:
(a) The department shall periodically review a local board’s resource allocations to support school improvement and provide technical assistance to the local school board; and
(b) The department may provide a recommended list of turnaround or school intervention providers that have demonstrated success implementing evidence-based strategies.
(14) If, in the course of a school audit, the audit team identifies information suggesting
that a violation of KRS § 160.345(9)(a) may have occurred, the commissioner of education shall forward the evidence to the Office of Education Accountability for investigation.
(15) A school’s right to establish a council granted under KRS § 160.345 may be restored by the local board of education two (2) years after the school exits comprehensive support and improvement status.
Effective: July 15, 2020
History: Amended 2020 Ky. Acts ch. 112, sec. 2, effective July 15, 2020. — Amended
2019 Ky. Acts ch. 199, sec. 3, effective June 27, 2019. — Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 156, sec. 12, effective April 10, 2017. — Amended 2012 Ky. Acts ch. 61, sec. 2, effective July 12, 2012. — Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 1, sec. 1, effective January
14, 2010. — Created 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 1, effective July 13, 2004.