Maine Revised Statutes Title 35-A Sec. 1305 – Hearings; examiners
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
1. Commission‘s powers. Each of the commissioners, for the purposes of this Title, may:
A. Hold hearings; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
B. Conduct investigations; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
C. Administer oaths; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
D. Certify to official acts; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
E. Issue subpoenas; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
F. Compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, accounts, papers, documents and testimony; [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
G. Punish by fine and imprisonment for contempt; and [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
H. Issue all processes necessary to the performance of the commission’s duties. [PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
[RR 2011, c. 2, §38 (COR).]
Terms Used In Maine Revised Statutes Title 35-A Sec. 1305
- Answer: The formal written statement by a defendant responding to a civil complaint and setting forth the grounds for defense.
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Commission: means the Public Utilities Commission. See Maine Revised Statutes Title 35-A Sec. 102
- Commissioner: means one of the members of the Public Utilities Commission. See Maine Revised Statutes Title 35-A Sec. 102
- Discovery: Lawyers' examination, before trial, of facts and documents in possession of the opponents to help the lawyers prepare for trial.
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Presiding officer: A majority-party Senator who presides over the Senate and is charged with maintaining order and decorum, recognizing Members to speak, and interpreting the Senate's rules, practices and precedents.
- Settlement: Parties to a lawsuit resolve their difference without having a trial. Settlements often involve the payment of compensation by one party in satisfaction of the other party's claims.
- Testimony: Evidence presented orally by witnesses during trials or before grand juries.
2. Examiners. The commission may appoint examiners who have authority to:
A. Administer oaths; [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
B. Examine witnesses; [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
C. Issue subpoenas; [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
D. Require the production of books, accounts, papers, documents and testimony; and [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
E. Receive evidence in any matter under the commission’s jurisdiction. [PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
The examiners also shall perform such other duties as may be assigned to them.
[PL 1987, c. 490, Pt. C, §4 (RPR).]
3. Evidence. Evidence taken and received by the examiners has the same effect as evidence taken and received by the commission and authorizes commission action as though taken and received by it. When objection is made to the admissibility of evidence, examiners authorized to practice before the Supreme Judicial Court shall rule on the admissibility of evidence in accordance with the practice and rules of evidence in civil actions in the Superior Court except as otherwise provided.
[PL 1993, c. 108, §1 (AMD).]
4. Right to appeal. Either the examiner or the commissioner, who is the presiding officer at the hearing, shall at the outset of the hearing inform the public as to the steps necessary to preserve its right to appeal the final order or decision of the commission to the Supreme Judicial Court under the provisions of section 1320.
[PL 1987, c. 141, Pt. A, §6 (NEW).]
5. Use of advisory staff. This subsection applies to the participation of advisory staff and consultants in commission proceedings.
A. If an advisory staff member or consultant relies upon facts not otherwise in the record or presents to the commission any independent financial or technical analysis not otherwise in the record, the staff member or consultant:
(1) Shall place any such information into the record;
(2) Is subject to discovery; and
(3) Must be available to answer questions regarding those facts or analysis, in the same manner as witnesses in the proceeding, at a time sufficient to permit parties to respond.
This paragraph does not apply to reviews, evaluations or examinations of information, data, studies, analyses or computer modeling placed into the record by other parties or other aid or advice provided by advisory staff members or consultants. Compliance with this paragraph does not render the advisory staff member or consultant an advocate under the Maine Administrative Procedure Act. [PL 1997, c. 691, §3 (NEW); PL 1997, c. 691, §10 (AFF).]
B. On request of any party in a proceeding, the commission shall assign one or more staff members who are not advisors in the proceeding to rule on any objection to discovery requests made by or directed to advisors. [PL 1997, c. 691, §3 (NEW); PL 1997, c. 691, §10 (AFF).]
C. The commission may assign one or more staff members who are not advisors in a proceeding to serve as advocates to facilitate negotiated settlements in the proceeding. If the commission receives a written request from all of the parties in an adjudicatory proceeding that one or more staff advocates be appointed to facilitate a negotiated settlement in the proceeding, the commission shall either grant the request or issue a written order explaining the reasons why the commission denies the request. [PL 1999, c. 602, §1 (AMD).]
[PL 1999, c. 602, §1 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 141, §A6 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 490, §C4 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 108, §1 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 691, §3 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 691, §10 (AFF). PL 1999, c. 602, §1 (AMD). RR 2011, c. 2, §38 (COR).