Maryland Code, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 4-109
Terms Used In Maryland Code, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 4-109
- Arrest: Taking physical custody of a person by lawful authority.
- Bail: Security given for the release of a criminal defendant or witness from legal custody (usually in the form of money) to secure his/her appearance on the day and time appointed.
- Defendant: In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
- Docket: A log containing brief entries of court proceedings.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Probation: A sentencing alternative to imprisonment in which the court releases convicted defendants under supervision as long as certain conditions are observed.
- state: means :
(1) a state, possession, territory, or commonwealth of the United States; or
(2) the District of Columbia. See - Summons: Another word for subpoena used by the criminal justice system.
- Trial: A hearing that takes place when the defendant pleads "not guilty" and witnesses are required to come to court to give evidence.
(b) A law enforcement agency may make a written request for the State‘s Attorney within the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agency to petition the administrative judge of the district to have a warrant, summons, or other criminal process in the possession of the law enforcement agency invalidated and destroyed due to the age of the unexecuted warrant, summons, or other criminal process and unavailability of the defendant, or other special circumstances, if:
(1) the warrant, summons, or other criminal process was issued for the arrest of the defendant in order that the defendant might stand for trial and has remained unexecuted for at least 5 years;
(2) the warrant, summons, or other criminal process was issued for the failure of the defendant to make a deferred payment of a fine or costs as ordered by the court and has remained unexecuted for at least 5 years;
(3) the warrant, summons, or other criminal process was issued for a violation of probation and has remained unexecuted for at least 5 years;
(4) except as provided in item (5) of this subsection, the warrant, summons, or other criminal process was issued for the arrest of the defendant for the failure of the defendant to appear as directed by the court and has remained unexecuted for at least 5 years; or
(5) the defendant was released on bail posted by a private surety, and the warrant was issued for the arrest of the defendant for the failure of the defendant to appear as directed by the court and has remained unexecuted for at least 10 years.
(c) (1) On receipt of a request made under subsection (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4) of this section, the State’s Attorney:
(i) if the warrant, summons, or other criminal process has remained unexecuted for more than 5 years but less than 7 years, may petition the Administrative Judge of the District for the invalidation and destruction of the unexecuted warrant, summons, or other process; and
(ii) if the warrant, summons, or other criminal process has remained unexecuted for at least 7 years, shall petition the Administrative Judge of the District for the invalidation and destruction of the unexecuted warrant, summons, or other process.
(2) On receipt of a request made under subsection (b)(5) of this section, the State’s Attorney shall petition the Administrative Judge of the District for the invalidation and destruction of the unexecuted warrant, summons, or other criminal process.
(d) The State’s Attorney may argue against the invalidation and destruction of a warrant, summons, or other criminal process of which the State’s Attorney has petitioned the court for invalidation and destruction under subsection (c)(1)(ii) or (2) of this section due to a justifiable continuing active investigation of the case.
(e) Unless preservation is determined by the court to be justifiable, the court shall order the invalidation and destruction of the unexecuted warrant, summons, or other criminal process in accordance with § 1-605 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article.
(f) An arrest may not be made under the authority of a warrant, summons, or other criminal process that has been ordered invalidated and destroyed.
(g) The State’s Attorney may enter a nolle prosequi or place the case on the stet docket at the time of the court order under this section.
(h) Nothing in this section may be construed to:
(1) prevent the reissuance of a warrant, summons, or other criminal process;
(2) affect the time within which a prosecution for a misdemeanor may be commenced;
(3) nullify or remove a failure to appear designation that has been placed on an individual’s driving record by the Motor Vehicle Administration; or
(4) affect any pending criminal charge.