Minnesota Statutes 119B.162 – Reconsideration of Correction Orders
(a) If a provider believes that the contents of the commissioner’s correction order issued under chapter 245E are in error, the provider may ask the commissioner to reconsider the parts of the correction order that are alleged to be in error. The request for reconsideration must be made in writing and must be postmarked and sent to the commissioner or submitted in the provider licensing and reporting hub within 30 calendar days from the date the correction order was mailed or issued through the hub to the provider, and:
Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 119B.162
- Allegation: something that someone says happened.
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Writ of certiorari: An order issued by the Supreme Court directing the lower court to transmit records for a case for which it will hear on appeal.
(1) specify the parts of the correction order that are alleged to be in error;
(2) explain why they are in error; and
(3) include documentation to support the allegation of error.
(b) Upon implementation of the provider licensing and reporting hub, the provider must use the hub to request reconsideration.
(c) A request for reconsideration does not stay any provisions or requirements of the correction order. The commissioner’s disposition of a request for reconsideration is final and not subject to appeal under chapter 14. The commissioner’s decision is appealable by petition for writ of certiorari under chapter 606.