Minnesota Statutes 174.185 – Pavement Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 174.185
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Minority: means with respect to an individual the period of time during which the individual is a minor. See Minnesota Statutes 645.451
Subdivision 1.Definitions.
For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply.
(a) “Life-cycle cost” is the sum of the cost of the initial pavement project and all anticipated costs for maintenance, repair, and resurfacing over the life of the pavement. Anticipated costs must be based on Minnesota’s actual or reasonably projected maintenance, repair, and resurfacing schedules, and costs determined by the Department of Transportation district personnel based upon recently awarded local projects and experience with local material costs.
(b) “Life-cycle cost analysis” is a comparison of life-cycle costs among competing paving materials using equal design lives and equal comparison periods.
Subd. 2.Required analysis.
For each project in the reconditioning, resurfacing, and road repair funding categories, the commissioner shall perform a life-cycle cost analysis and shall document the lowest life-cycle costs and all alternatives considered. The commissioner shall document the chosen pavement strategy and, if the lowest life cycle is not selected, document the justification for the chosen strategy. A life-cycle cost analysis is required for projects to be constructed after July 1, 2011.
Subd. 3.Report.
The commissioner shall report annually to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance on the results of the analyses required in subdivision 2.