Minnesota Statutes 3E.06 – Effect of Authentication
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
Subdivision 1.Presumption of accuracy.
Legal material in an electronic record that is authenticated under section 3E.05 is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.
Subd. 2.Presumption in another state.
Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 3E.06
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- state: extends to and includes the District of Columbia and the several territories. See Minnesota Statutes 645.44
Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 3E.06
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- state: extends to and includes the District of Columbia and the several territories. See Minnesota Statutes 645.44
If another state has adopted a law substantially similar to this chapter, legal material in an electronic record that is designated as official and authenticated by the official publisher in that state is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.
Subd. 3.Burden of proof.
A party contesting the authentication of legal material in an electronic record authenticated under section 3E.05 has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the record is not authentic.