Missouri Laws 23.268 – Criteria considered by committee
The committee and its staff shall consider the following criteria in determining whether a public need exists for the continuation of a program, or for the performance of the functions of the program:
(1) The efficiency with which the program operates;
Terms Used In Missouri Laws 23.268
- agency: includes each department and office within the executive branch of government and each identifiable unit thereof, including institutions of higher learning, and each identifiable unit of the legislative and judicial branches of government. See Missouri Laws 23.160
- following: when used by way of reference to any section of the statutes, mean the section next preceding or next following that in which the reference is made, unless some other section is expressly designated in the reference. See Missouri Laws 1.020
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- State: when applied to any of the United States, includes the District of Columbia and the territories, and the words "United States" includes such district and territories. See Missouri Laws 1.020
- Statute: A law passed by a legislature.
- United States: includes such district and territories. See Missouri Laws 1.020
(2) An identification of the objectives intended for the program and the problem or need that the program was intended to address, the extent to which the objectives have been achieved, and any activities of the agency in addition to those granted by statute and the authority for such activities;
(3) An assessment of less restrictive or alternative methods of performing any rule or regulation that the agency performs that could adequately protect the public;
(4) The extent to which the jurisdiction of the agency and the programs administered by the agency overlap or duplicate those of other agencies and the extent to which the programs administered by the agency can be consolidated with the programs of other state agencies;
(5) Whether the agency has recommended to the general assembly statutory changes calculated to be of benefit to the public rather than to an occupation, business, or institution that the agency regulates;
(6) The promptness and effectiveness with which the agency disposes of complaints concerning persons affected by the program;
(7) The extent to which the agency has encouraged participation by the public in making rules and decisions as opposed to participation solely by those it regulates and the extent to which the public participation has resulted in rules compatible with the objectives of the program;
(8) The extent to which the agency has complied with applicable requirements of:
(a) An agency of the United States or this state regarding equality of employment opportunity and the rights and privacy of individuals; and
(b) State law and applicable rules of any state agency regarding purchasing goals and programs for historically underutilized businesses;
(9) The extent to which changes are necessary in the enabling statutes of the program so that the agency can adequately comply with the criteria established in this section;
(10) The extent to which the agency issues and enforces rules relating to potential conflicts of interest of its employees;
(11) The extent to which the agency complies with chapter 610 and follows records management practices that enable the agency to respond efficiently to requests for public information; and
(12) The effect of federal intervention or loss of federal funds if the program is sunset.