Montana Code 27-18-205. When judge may issue writ — notice
27-18-205. When judge may issue writ — notice. A judge of a court having jurisdiction of the cause may issue a writ of attachment when:
Terms Used In Montana Code 27-18-205
- Attachment: A procedure by which a person's property is seized to pay judgments levied by the court.
- Defendant: In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Person: includes a corporation or other entity as well as a natural person. See Montana Code 1-1-201
- Property: means real and personal property. See Montana Code 1-1-205
- Writ: A formal written command, issued from the court, requiring the performance of a specific act.
- Writ: means an order in writing issued in the name of the state or of a court or judicial officer. See Montana Code 1-1-202
(1)the judge has received the affidavit described in 27-18-202;
(2)the judge has approved the undertaking required in 27-18-204; and
(3)the party seeking attachment has made a prima facie showing:
(a)in the case of real property, of the right to attachment and the necessity for seizure;
(b)in the case of personal property:
(i)of the right to attachment and the necessity for seizure at a show cause hearing before the court with at least 3 days’ notice to the defendant; if the defendant cannot be found for personal service, notice must be posted on the property and in three public places in the county where the property is located; or
(ii)of the right to attachment and the necessity for seizure and that the delay caused by notice and a hearing would seriously impair the remedy sought by the party seeking possession. Evidence of the impairment must be presented in open court, and the court shall set forth with specificity the reasons why the delay would seriously impair the remedy sought by the person seeking attachment.