Montana Code 33-32-208. Operational requirements
33-32-208. Operational requirements. (1) A utilization review program must use documented clinical review criteria that are based on sound clinical evidence and are evaluated periodically to ensure ongoing efficacy. A health insurance issuer may develop its own clinical review criteria or may purchase or license clinical review criteria from qualified vendors.
Terms Used In Montana Code 33-32-208
- Authorized representative: means :
(a)a person to whom a covered person has given express written consent to represent the covered person;
(b)a person authorized by law to provided substituted consent for a covered person; or
(c)a family member of the covered person, or the covered person's treating health care provider, only if the covered person is unable to provide consent. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- benefits: means those health care services to which a covered person is entitled under the terms of a health plan. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Clinical review criteria: means the written policies, written screening procedures, decision abstracts, determination rules, clinical and medical protocols, practice guidelines, or any other criteria or rationale used by a health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization to determine the medical necessity of health care services. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Covered person: means a policyholder, a certificate holder, a member, a subscriber, an enrollee, or another individual participating in a health plan. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- External review: describes the set of procedures provided for in Title 33, chapter 32, part 4. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Grievance: means a written complaint or an oral complaint if the complaint involves an urgent care request submitted by or on behalf of a covered person regarding:
(a)availability, delivery, or quality of health care services, including a complaint regarding an adverse determination made pursuant to utilization review;
(b)claims payment, handling, or reimbursement for health care services; or
(c)matters pertaining to the contractual relationship between a covered person and a health insurance issuer. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Health care services: means services for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, cure, or relief of a health condition, illness, injury, or disease, including the provision of pharmaceutical products or services or durable medical equipment. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Health insurance issuer: has the meaning provided in 33-22-140. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Oversight: Committee review of the activities of a Federal agency or program.
- Person: means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an association, a joint venture, a joint stock company, a trust, an unincorporated organization, or any similar entity or combination of entities in this subsection. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Process: means a writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings. See Montana Code 1-1-202
- provider: means a person, corporation, facility, or institution licensed by the state to provide, or otherwise lawfully providing, health care services, including but not limited to:
(a)a physician, physician assistant, advanced practice registered nurse, health care facility as defined in 50-5-101, osteopath, dentist, nurse, optometrist, chiropractor, podiatrist, physical therapist, psychologist, licensed social worker, speech pathologist, audiologist, licensed addiction counselor, or licensed professional counselor; and
(b)an officer, employee, or agent of a person described in subsection (18)(a) acting in the course and scope of employment. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- State: when applied to the different parts of the United States, includes the District of Columbia and the territories. See Montana Code 1-1-201
- Utilization review: means a set of formal techniques designed to monitor the use of or to evaluate the clinical necessity, appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency of health care services, procedures, or settings. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Utilization review organization: means an entity that conducts utilization review for one or more of the following:
(a)an employer with employees who are covered under a health benefit plan or health insurance policy;
(b)a health insurance issuer providing review for its own health plans or for the health plans of another health insurance issuer;
(c)a preferred provider organization or health maintenance organization; and
(d)any other individual or entity that provides, offers to provide, or administers hospital, outpatient, medical, or other health benefits to a person treated by a health care provider under a policy, plan, or contract. See Montana Code 33-32-102
(2)A health insurance issuer shall, on request, make available its clinical review criteria to authorized government agencies, including the commissioner.
(3)Qualified health care professionals shall administer and oversee the utilization review program.
(4)A health insurance issuer shall issue utilization review and benefit determinations in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of 33-32-211 and 33-32-212.
(5)(a) Whenever a health insurance issuer fails to adhere to the requirements of 33-32-211 or 33-32-212, as applicable, with respect to conducting a utilization review and making benefit determinations of a benefit request or claim, the covered person is considered to have exhausted the provisions of this part and may take action under subsection (5)(b).
(b)A covered person may file a request for external review in accordance with the procedures outlined in Title 33, chapter 32, part 4. In addition to filing a request, a covered person is entitled to pursue any available remedies under state or federal law if the health insurance issuer failed to provide a reasonable internal claims and appeals process designed to yield a decision on the merits of the claim.
(6)(a) Section 33-32-211 or 33-32-212 may not be considered exhausted based on a de minimis violation that does not cause and is not likely to cause prejudice or harm to the covered person, as long as the health insurance issuer demonstrates that the violation was for good cause or was due to matters beyond the control of the health insurance issuer and that the violation occurred in the context of an ongoing, good faith exchange of information between the health insurance issuer and the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative.
(b)The exception provided in subsection (6)(a) does not apply if the violation is part of a pattern or practice of violations by the health insurance issuer.
(7)A health insurance issuer shall maintain a process to ensure that utilization reviewers apply clinical review criteria consistently in conducting utilization review.
(8)A health insurance issuer shall routinely assess the effectiveness and efficiency of its utilization review program.
(9)A health insurance issuer’s data systems must be sufficient to support utilization review program activities and to generate management reports to enable the health insurance issuer to monitor and manage health care services effectively.
(10)If a health insurance issuer delegates any utilization review activities to a utilization review organization, the health insurance issuer shall maintain adequate oversight, which includes:
(a)a written description of the utilization review organization’s activities and responsibilities, including reporting requirements;
(b)evidence of formal approval of the utilization review organization’s program by the health insurance issuer; and
(c)a process by which the health insurance issuer evaluates the performance of the utilization review organization.
(11)A health insurance issuer shall coordinate its utilization review program with other medical management activity conducted by the health insurance issuer, such as quality assurance, credentialing, health care provider contracting, data reporting, grievance procedures, processes for assessing member satisfaction, and risk management.
(12)A health insurance issuer shall provide covered persons and participating providers with access to the health insurance issuer’s review staff through a toll-free number or collect-call telephone line.
(13)When conducting a utilization review, a health insurance issuer shall collect only the information necessary, including pertinent clinical information, to conduct the utilization review or make the benefit determination.
(14)(a) When conducting a utilization review, a health insurance issuer shall ensure that the review is conducted in a manner that ensures the independence and impartiality of the individuals involved in conducting the utilization review or making the benefit determination.
(b)In ensuring the independence and impartiality of individuals involved in the utilization review or benefit determination, a health insurance issuer may not make decisions regarding hiring, compensation, termination, promotion, or other similar matters based on the likelihood that the individual involved in the utilization review or benefit determination will support the denial of benefits.