Montana Code 33-32-412. External review of adverse determinations for experimental or investigational treatment — expedited external review
33-32-412. External review of adverse determinations for experimental or investigational treatment — expedited external review. (1) Within 120 days after the date when a covered person or, if applicable, the covered person‘s authorized representative receives notice pursuant to 33-32-403 of an adverse determination or final adverse determination that involves a denial of coverage because a health insurance issuer determined that the health care service or treatment recommended or requested is experimental or investigational, the covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative may file a request for an external review with the health insurance issuer.
Terms Used In Montana Code 33-32-412
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Authorized representative: means :
(a)a person to whom a covered person has given express written consent to represent the covered person;
(b)a person authorized by law to provided substituted consent for a covered person; or
(c)a family member of the covered person, or the covered person's treating health care provider, only if the covered person is unable to provide consent. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- benefits: means those health care services to which a covered person is entitled under the terms of a health plan. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Clinical peer: means a physician or other health care provider who:
(a)holds a nonrestricted license in a state of the United States; and
(b)is trained or works in the same or a similar specialty to the specialty that typically manages the medical condition, procedure, or treatment under review. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Covered person: means a policyholder, a certificate holder, a member, a subscriber, an enrollee, or another individual participating in a health plan. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- External review: describes the set of procedures provided for in Title 33, chapter 32, part 4. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Final adverse determination: means an adverse determination involving a covered benefit that has been upheld by a health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization at the completion of the health insurance issuer's internal grievance process as provided in Title 33, chapter 32, part 3. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Grievance: means a written complaint or an oral complaint if the complaint involves an urgent care request submitted by or on behalf of a covered person regarding:
(a)availability, delivery, or quality of health care services, including a complaint regarding an adverse determination made pursuant to utilization review;
(b)claims payment, handling, or reimbursement for health care services; or
(c)matters pertaining to the contractual relationship between a covered person and a health insurance issuer. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Health care services: means services for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, cure, or relief of a health condition, illness, injury, or disease, including the provision of pharmaceutical products or services or durable medical equipment. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Health insurance issuer: has the meaning provided in 33-22-140. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Person: means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an association, a joint venture, a joint stock company, a trust, an unincorporated organization, or any similar entity or combination of entities in this subsection. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Process: means a writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings. See Montana Code 1-1-202
- provider: means a person, corporation, facility, or institution licensed by the state to provide, or otherwise lawfully providing, health care services, including but not limited to:
(a)a physician, physician assistant, advanced practice registered nurse, health care facility as defined in 50-5-101, osteopath, dentist, nurse, optometrist, chiropractor, podiatrist, physical therapist, psychologist, licensed social worker, speech pathologist, audiologist, licensed addiction counselor, or licensed professional counselor; and
(b)an officer, employee, or agent of a person described in subsection (18)(a) acting in the course and scope of employment. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Retrospective review: means a review of medical necessity conducted after services have been provided to a covered person. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Uphold: The decision of an appellate court not to reverse a lower court decision.
- Utilization review: means a set of formal techniques designed to monitor the use of or to evaluate the clinical necessity, appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency of health care services, procedures, or settings. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Utilization review organization: means an entity that conducts utilization review for one or more of the following:
(a)an employer with employees who are covered under a health benefit plan or health insurance policy;
(b)a health insurance issuer providing review for its own health plans or for the health plans of another health insurance issuer;
(c)a preferred provider organization or health maintenance organization; and
(d)any other individual or entity that provides, offers to provide, or administers hospital, outpatient, medical, or other health benefits to a person treated by a health care provider under a policy, plan, or contract. See Montana Code 33-32-102
- Writing: includes printing. See Montana Code 1-1-203
(2)(a) A covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative may make an oral request for an expedited external review of the adverse determination or final adverse determination pursuant to subsection (1) if the covered person’s treating health care provider certifies, in writing, that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the request would be significantly less effective if not promptly initiated.
(b)(i) Upon receipt of a request for an expedited external review, the health insurance issuer shall immediately determine and notify the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative whether the request meets the review requirements of subsection (4).
(ii)The commissioner may specify the form for the health insurance issuer’s notice of initial determination under subsection (2)(b)(i) and any supporting information to be included in the notice.
(iii)The notice of initial determination under subsection (2)(b)(i) must include a statement informing the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative of the right to appeal to the commissioner a health insurance issuer’s initial determination that the external review request is ineligible for review. The notice must also provide contact information for the commissioner’s office.
(c)(i) The commissioner may determine that a request is eligible for external review under 33-32-404 or subsection (4) of this section and may require a referral for external review, notwithstanding a health insurance issuer’s initial determination that the request is ineligible.
(ii)A determination by the commissioner under subsection (2)(c)(i) must be based on the terms of the covered person’s health plan and all applicable provisions of Title 33, chapter 32, parts 2 through 4.
(d)(i) If the request is eligible for expedited external review, the health insurance issuer shall immediately assign an independent review organization on a random basis, or using another method of assignment that ensures the independence and impartiality of the assignment process, from the list of approved independent review organizations compiled and maintained by the commissioner pursuant to 33-32-416 to conduct the external review.
(ii)In making the assignment, the health insurance issuer shall consider whether an independent review organization is qualified to conduct the particular external review based on the nature of the health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(iii)The health insurance issuer shall also take into account other circumstances, including conflict of interest concerns pursuant to 33-32-417(4).
(e)Upon assigning an independent review organization, the health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization shall provide or transmit to the assigned independent review organization electronically, by telephone, by facsimile, or by any other available expeditious method all necessary documents and information used in making the adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(3)Upon receipt of a request for standard external review, the health insurance issuer shall, within 5 business days, determine whether the request meets the eligibility requirements of subsection (4).
(4)In accordance with the timeframes in subsections (2)(b) and (3), the health insurance issuer shall conduct and complete a preliminary review of the request to determine whether:
(a)the individual is or was a covered person in the health plan at the time the health care service or treatment was recommended or requested or, in the case of a retrospective review, was a covered person in the health plan at the time the health care service or treatment was provided;
(b)the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination or final adverse determination:
(i)is a covered benefit under the covered person’s health plan except for the health insurance issuer’s determination that the service or treatment is experimental or investigational for a particular medical condition; and
(ii)is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit under the covered person’s health plan;
(c)the covered person’s treating health care provider has certified that one of the following situations is applicable:
(i)standard health care services or treatments have not been effective in improving the condition of the covered person;
(ii)standard health care services or treatments are not medically appropriate for the covered person; or
(iii)there is no available standard health care service or treatment covered by the health insurance issuer that is more beneficial than the recommended or requested health care service or treatment described in subsection (4)(d);
(d)(i) the covered person’s treating health care provider has recommended a health care service or treatment that the health care provider certifies, in writing, is likely to be more beneficial to the covered person, in the health care provider’s opinion, than any available standard health care services or treatments; or
(ii)a physician who is licensed, board-certified, or eligible to take the examination to become board-certified and is qualified to practice in the area of medicine appropriate to treat the covered person’s condition has certified in writing that scientifically valid studies using accepted protocols demonstrate that the health care service or treatment requested by the covered person who is subject to the adverse determination or final adverse determination is likely to be more beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care services or treatments; and
(e)the covered person has exhausted the health insurance issuer’s internal grievance process provided in Title 33, chapter 32, part 3, or the covered person is exempt under 33-32-307(2).
(5)(a) Within 1 business day after completion of the preliminary review, the health insurance issuer shall notify the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative in writing as to whether:
(i)the request is complete; and
(ii)the request is eligible for external review.
(b)(i) If the request is not complete, the health insurance issuer shall inform the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative in writing and include in the notice the information or materials that are needed to make the request complete.
(ii)If the request is not eligible for external review, the health insurance issuer shall inform the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative in writing and include in the notice the reasons for the request’s ineligibility.
(6)(a) The commissioner may specify the form for the health insurance issuer’s notice of initial determination under subsection (5) and any supporting information to be included in the notice.
(b)The notice of initial determination provided under subsection (5) must include a statement informing the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative of the right to appeal to the commissioner a health insurance issuer’s initial determination that the external review request is ineligible for review. The notice must also provide contact information for the commissioner’s office.
(7)If a request for external review is determined eligible for external review, the health insurance issuer shall notify the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative.
(8)(a) If the request is eligible for external review, the health insurance issuer shall within 1 business day assign an independent review organization on a random basis, or using another method of assignment that ensures the independence and impartiality of the assignment process, from the list of approved independent review organizations compiled and maintained by the commissioner pursuant to 33-32-416 to conduct the external review.
(b)In making the assignment, the health insurance issuer shall consider whether an independent review organization is qualified to conduct the particular external review based on the nature of the health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(c)The health insurance issuer shall also take into account other circumstances, including conflict of interest concerns pursuant to 33-32-417(4).
(9)Within 1 business day of assigning an independent review organization pursuant to subsection (2)(d) or (8), the health insurance issuer shall notify in writing the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative that the health insurance issuer initiated an external review.
(10)The health insurance issuer shall include in the notice provided to the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative a statement that the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative may submit in writing to the assigned independent review organization within 10 business days following the date of receipt of the notice provided pursuant to subsection (9) any additional information for the independent review organization to consider when conducting the external review. The independent review organization shall accept and consider information submitted within 10 business days after the date of receipt of the notice and may accept and consider additional information submitted after the 10 business days.
(11)Within 1 business day after the receipt of the notice of assignment to conduct the external review pursuant to subsection (9), the assigned independent review organization shall select a clinical peer, or multiple peers if medically appropriate under the circumstances, to conduct the external review.
(12)(a) In selecting clinical peers to conduct the external review, the assigned independent review organization shall select physicians or other health care providers who meet the minimum qualifications described in 33-32-417 and who, through clinical experience in the past 3 years, are experts in the treatment of the covered person’s condition and knowledgeable about the recommended or requested health care service or treatment.
(b)The choice of the physicians or other health care providers to conduct the external review may not be made by the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, or the health insurance issuer.
(13)(a) In accordance with subsection (20), each clinical peer shall provide a written opinion to the assigned independent review organization on whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered.
(b)In reaching an opinion, clinical peers are not bound by any decisions or conclusions reached during the health insurance issuer’s utilization review process provided for in Title 33, chapter 32, part 2, or in the health insurance issuer’s internal grievance process provided for in Title 33, chapter 32, part 3.
(14)(a) Within 5 business days after assigning an independent review organization pursuant to subsection (9), the health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization shall provide to the assigned independent review organization any documents and information considered in making the adverse determination or the final adverse determination.
(b)Except as provided in subsection (15), failure by the health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization to provide the documents and information within the time specified in subsection (14)(a) may not delay the conduct of the external review.
(15)(a) If the health insurance issuer or its designated utilization review organization fails to provide the documents and information within the time specified in subsection (14)(a), the assigned independent review organization may terminate the external review and decide to reverse the adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(b)Immediately upon making the determination under subsection (15)(a), the independent review organization shall notify the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative, the health insurance issuer, and the commissioner.
(16)On receipt of any information submitted by the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to subsection (10), the assigned independent review organization shall, within 1 business day after the receipt of the information, forward the information to the health insurance issuer.
(17)(a) On receipt of the information required to be forwarded pursuant to subsection (16), the health insurance issuer may reconsider its adverse determination or final adverse determination that is the subject of the external review.
(b)Reconsideration by the health insurance issuer of its adverse determination or final adverse determination pursuant to subsection (17)(a) may not delay or terminate the external review.
(18)(a) The external review may be terminated only if the health insurance issuer decides, on completion of its reconsideration, to reverse its adverse determination or final adverse determination and provide coverage or payment for the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(b)Immediately upon making the decision to reverse its adverse determination or final adverse determination, as provided in subsection (18)(a), the health insurance issuer shall notify the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative, the assigned independent review organization, and the commissioner in writing of its decision.
(c)The assigned independent review organization shall terminate the external review on receipt of the notice from the health insurance issuer pursuant to subsection (18)(b).
(19)Each clinical peer selected pursuant to subsection (12) shall review all of the information and documents received pursuant to subsection (14) and any other information submitted in writing by the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to subsection (10).
(20)(a) Except as provided in subsection (20)(c), within 20 days after being selected in accordance with subsection (12) to conduct the external review, each clinical peer shall provide an opinion to the assigned independent review organization pursuant to subsection (21) on whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered.
(b)Except for an opinion provided pursuant to subsection (20)(c), each clinical peer’s opinion must be in writing and must include the following information:
(i)a description of the covered person’s medical condition;
(ii)a description of the indicators relevant to determining whether there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment is more likely than not to be more beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care services or treatments and that the adverse risks of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment would not be substantially increased over those of available standard health care services or treatments;
(iii)a description and analysis of any medical or scientific evidence considered in reaching the opinion;
(iv)a description and analysis of any evidence-based standard; and
(v)information on whether the clinical peer’s rationale for the opinion is based on subsection (21)(a) or (21)(b).
(c)(i) For an expedited external review, each clinical peer shall provide an opinion orally or in writing to the assigned independent review organization as expeditiously as the covered person’s medical condition or circumstances require but no later than 5 calendar days after the clinical peer was selected in accordance with subsection (12).
(ii)If the opinion provided pursuant to subsection (20)(c)(i) was not in writing, the clinical peer shall provide to the assigned independent review organization written confirmation of the opinion within 48 hours after the date the opinion was delivered and include the information required under subsection (20)(b).
(21)In addition to the documents and information provided under this section, each clinical peer selected pursuant to subsection (12) shall consider the following information in reaching an opinion as required in subsection (20) to the extent that the information is available and the clinical peer considers the information to be appropriate:
(a)the covered person’s pertinent medical records;
(b)the attending health care provider’s recommendation;
(c)consulting reports from appropriate health care professionals and other documents submitted by the health insurance issuer, the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, or the covered person’s treating health care provider;
(d)the terms of coverage under the covered person’s health plan with the health insurance issuer. The terms of coverage must be analyzed to ensure that, except for the health insurance issuer’s determination that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the opinion is experimental or investigational, the clinical peer’s opinion is not contrary to the terms of coverage under the covered person’s health benefit plan with the health insurance issuer; and
(e)whether:
(i)the recommended or requested health care service or treatment has been approved by the food and drug administration, if applicable, for the condition;
(ii)the recommended or requested health care service or treatment is typically covered by other insurers or payers, such as medicare; or
(iii)medical or scientific evidence or evidence-based standards demonstrate that the expected benefits of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment is more likely than not to be more beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care service or treatment and that the adverse risks of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment would not be substantially increased over those of available standard health care services or treatments.
(22)(a) Except as provided in subsection (22)(b), within 20 days after the date of receiving the opinion of each clinical peer pursuant to subsection (20), the assigned independent review organization shall make a decision and provide written notice of the decision to the covered person or, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative as well as the health insurance issuer.
(b)(i) For an expedited external review, within 48 hours after the date of receiving the opinion of each clinical peer pursuant to subsection (20), the assigned independent review organization, in accordance with subsection (22)(c), shall make a decision and provide notice of the decision orally or in writing to the recipients listed in subsection (22)(a).
(ii)If the notice provided under subsection (22)(b)(i) was not in writing, within 48 hours after the date of providing that notice the assigned independent review organization shall provide written confirmation of the decision to the recipients listed in subsection (22)(a) and include the information set forth in subsection (22)(d).
(c)(i) If a majority of the clinical peers respond that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the independent review organization shall make a decision to reverse the health insurance issuer’s adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(ii)If a majority of the clinical peers respond that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should not be covered, the independent review organization shall make a decision to uphold the health insurance issuer’s adverse determination or final adverse determination.
(iii)If the clinical peers are evenly split as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the independent review organization shall obtain the opinion of an additional clinical peer to help the independent review organization make a decision based on the opinions of a majority of the clinical peers pursuant to subsections (22)(c)(i) or (22)(c)(ii).
(iv)The additional clinical peer selected under subsection (22)(c)(iii) shall use the same information to reach an opinion as used by the clinical peers who have already submitted their opinions pursuant to subsection (20).
(v)The selection of the additional clinical peer under subsection (22)(c)(iii) may not extend the time within which the assigned independent review organization is required to make a decision based on the opinions of the clinical peers.
(d)The independent review organization shall include in the notice provided pursuant to subsection (22)(b):
(i)a general description of the reason for the request for external review;
(ii)the written opinion of each clinical peer, including the opinion of each clinical peer as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered and the rationale for the reviewer’s recommendation;
(iii)the date on which the independent review organization was assigned by the commissioner to conduct the external review;
(iv)the time period during which the external review was conducted;
(v)the date of the independent review organization’s decision; and
(vi)the principal rationale for its decision.
(e)On receipt of a notice of a decision pursuant to subsection (22)(c)(i) reversing the adverse determination or final adverse determination, the health insurance issuer shall immediately approve coverage of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that was the subject of the adverse determination or final adverse determination.