39-31-504. Selection of arbitrator — procedure — cost sharing. (1) (a) After receipt of the petition to arbitrate under 39-31-502(2)(d), the board of personnel appeals shall submit a list of five qualified, disinterested, and unbiased individuals to the parties. Each party shall alternately strike two names from the list. The order of striking names must be determined by a coin toss. The remaining individual is the arbitrator.

Ask an employment law question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified employment lawyers
Specialties include: Employment Law, EEOC, Pension and Compensation, Harassment Law, Discrimination Law, Termination Law, General Legal and more.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

(b)If the parties have not designated the arbitrator and notified the board of personnel appeals of their choice within 5 days of receipt of the list, the board of personnel appeals shall appoint the arbitrator from the names on the list. However, if one of the parties strikes names from the list, as provided in subsection (1)(a), the board of personnel appeals shall appoint the arbitrator from the names remaining on the list.

(2)The arbitrator shall establish the dates, times, and places of hearings. The arbitrator may issue subpoenas. Within 14 calendar days prior to the date of a hearing, each party shall submit to the other party a written last best offer package on all unresolved mandatory subjects. The last best offer package may not be changed. The arbitrator may administer oaths and shall afford the parties the opportunity to examine and cross-examine all witnesses and to present evidence relevant to the dispute.

(3)The arbitrator shall decide the unresolved mandatory subjects contained in the last best offer package. The arbitrator shall base findings and opinions on the criteria listed in subsections (3)(a) through (3)(h). Primary consideration must be given to the criteria in subsection (3)(a). The criteria are:

(a)the interest and welfare of the public;

(b)the reasonable financial ability of the unit of government to meet the costs of the proposed contract, giving consideration and weight to the other services provided by the unit of government, as determined by the governing body of the unit of government;

(c)the ability of the unit of government to attract and retain qualified personnel at the wage and benefit levels provided;

(d)the overall compensation presently received by the police officers, including direct wage compensation, holiday pay, other paid excused time, insurance, and all other direct or indirect monetary benefits;

(e)comparison of the overall compensation of other police officers in comparable communities with similar populations in Montana and contiguous states;

(f)inflation as measured by the consumer price index, U.S. city average, commonly known as the cost of living;

(g)the stipulations of the parties; and

(h)other factors, consistent with subsections (3)(a) through (3)(g), that are traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. However, the arbitrator may not use other factors if, in the judgment of the arbitrator, the factors listed in subsections (3)(a) through (3)(g) provide a sufficient basis for an award.

(4)Within 30 days after the conclusion of the hearings or an additional period agreed upon by the parties, the arbitrator shall select only one of the last best offer packages submitted by the parties and shall make written findings along with an opinion and order. The opinion and order must be served on the parties and the board of personnel appeals. Service may be made by personal delivery or by certified mail. The findings, opinion, and order must be based upon the criteria listed in subsection (3).

(5)The cost of arbitration must be borne equally by the parties.