1.  The parents of a proposed protected minor, or either parent, if qualified and suitable, are preferred over all others for appointment as guardian for the person or estate or person and estate of the proposed protected minor. The appointment of a parent as guardian for the person or estate of a proposed protected minor must not conflict with a valid order for custody of the proposed protected minor.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

2.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if a parent of a proposed protected minor files a petition seeking appointment as guardian for the proposed protected minor, the parent is presumed to be suitable to serve as guardian for the proposed protected minor.

3.  In determining whether the parents of a proposed protected minor, or either parent, or any other person who seeks appointment as guardian for the proposed protected minor is qualified and suitable, the court shall consider, if applicable and without limitation:

(a) Which parent has physical custody of the proposed protected minor;

(b) The ability of the parents, parent or other person to provide for the basic needs of the proposed protected minor, including, without limitation, food, shelter, clothing and medical care, taking into consideration any special needs of the proposed protected minor;

(c) Whether the parents, parent or other person has engaged in the habitual use of alcohol or any controlled substance during the previous 6 months, except the use of cannabis in accordance with the provisions of chapter 678C of NRS;

(d) Whether the parents, parent or other person has been convicted of a crime of moral turpitude, a crime involving domestic violence or a crime involving the abuse, neglect, exploitation, isolation or abandonment of a child, his or her spouse, his or her parent or any other adult;

(e) Whether the parents, parent or other person has been convicted in this State or any other jurisdiction of a felony; and

(f) Whether the parents, parent or other person has engaged in one or more acts of domestic violence against the proposed protected minor, a parent of the proposed protected minor or any other person who resides with the proposed protected minor.

4.  A parent of a proposed protected minor is presumed to be unsuitable to care for the proposed protected minor if:

(a) The parent is unable to provide for any or all of the basic needs of the proposed protected minor, including, without limitation:

(1) Food;

(2) Shelter;

(3) Clothing;

(4) Medical care; and

(5) Education;

(b) Because of action or inaction, the parent poses a significant safety risk of either physical or emotional danger to the proposed protected minor; or

(c) The proposed protected minor has not been in the care, custody and control of the parent for the 6 months immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The presumption created by this paragraph is a rebuttable presumption.

5.  Subject to the preference set forth in subsection 1 and except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, the court shall appoint as guardian the qualified person who is most suitable and is willing to serve.

6.  In determining which qualified person is most suitable, the court shall, in addition to considering any applicable factors set forth in subsections 2, 3 and 4, give consideration, among other factors, to:

(a) Any nomination of a guardian for the proposed protected minor contained in a will or other written instrument executed by a parent of the proposed protected minor.

(b) Any request made by the proposed protected minor, if he or she is 14 years of age or older, for the appointment of a person as guardian for the proposed protected minor.

(c) The relationship by blood or adoption of the proposed guardian to the proposed protected minor. In considering preferences of appointment, the court may consider relatives of the half blood equally with those of the whole blood. The court may consider relatives in the following order of preference:

(1) Parent.

(2) Adult sibling.

(3) Grandparent.

(4) Uncle or aunt.

(d) Any recommendation made by a master of the court or special master pursuant to NRS 159A.0615.

(e) Any recommendation made by:

(1) An agency which provides child welfare services, an agency which provides child protective services or a similar agency; or

(2) A guardian ad litem or court appointed special advocate who represents the proposed protected minor.

(f) Any request for the appointment of any other interested person that the court deems appropriate.

7.  The court may award temporary guardianship pursuant to this section, supported by findings of suitability, pending a trial or evidentiary hearing if that appointment is supported by findings.

8.  Notwithstanding the presumption set forth in subsection 4, in the event of competing petitions for the appointment of guardianship of a proposed protected minor, any finding of unsuitability of a parent of the proposed protected minor must be found by clear and convincing evidence after a hearing on the merits or an evidentiary hearing.

9.  In determining whether to appoint a guardian of the person or estate of a proposed protected minor and who should be appointed, the court must always act in the best interests of the proposed protected minor.

10.  A court shall not refuse to appoint a person as a guardian of the person or estate of a proposed protected minor solely because the person:

(a) Is deaf, is blind or has another physical disability; or

(b) Is the holder of a valid registry identification card.

11.  As used in this section:

(a) ’Agency which provides child welfare services’ has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 432B.030.

(b) ’Blind’ has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 426.082.

(c) ’Holder of a valid registry identification card’ means a person who holds a valid registry identification card as defined in NRS 678C.080 that identifies the person as:

(1) Exempt from state prosecution for engaging in the medical use of cannabis; or

(2) A designated primary caregiver as defined in NRS 678C.040.