Nevada Revised Statutes 172.197 – Procedure when person subpoenaed to appear before grand jury intends to assert constitutional privilege against self-incrimination
1. If a person who has been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury informs the district attorney that the person intends to refuse to testify and to assert the person’s constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, the district attorney shall:
Terms Used In Nevada Revised Statutes 172.197
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Grand jury: agreement providing that a lender will delay exercising its rights (in the case of a mortgage,
- Subpoena: A command to a witness to appear and give testimony.
- Testify: Answer questions in court.
- Testimony: Evidence presented orally by witnesses during trials or before grand juries.
(a) Move for an order of immunity pursuant to NRS 178.572;
(b) Challenge the existence of a valid privilege by filing in any court of record a motion to compel the testimony of the person; or
(c) Withdraw the subpoena.
2. All proceedings which are held on a motion filed pursuant to subsection 1 must be closed.
3. If the existence of the privilege is challenged, the court shall hear the evidence of both parties and determine whether or not a valid privilege exists and to which matters, if any, it extends.
4. The district attorney shall not call a person to testify before a grand jury regarding matters which have been so determined to be within the person’s constitutional privilege against self-incrimination.