(a) It is the duty of the board, and it has the power to:

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In Tennessee Code 49-1-302

  • Amendment: A proposal to alter the text of a pending bill or other measure by striking out some of it, by inserting new language, or both. Before an amendment becomes part of the measure, thelegislature must agree to it.
  • Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
  • Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
  • Person: includes a corporation, firm, company or association. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • Property: includes both personal and real property. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • Quorum: The number of legislators that must be present to do business.
  • Representative: when applied to those who represent a decedent, includes executors and administrators, unless the context implies heirs and distributees. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • Restitution: The court-ordered payment of money by the defendant to the victim for damages caused by the criminal action.
  • signed: includes a mark, the name being written near the mark and witnessed, or any other symbol or methodology executed or adopted by a party with intention to authenticate a writing or record, regardless of being witnessed. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • State: when applied to the different parts of the United States, includes the District of Columbia and the several territories of the United States. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • written: includes printing, typewriting, engraving, lithography, and any other mode of representing words and letters. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
  • Year: means a calendar year, unless otherwise expressed. See Tennessee Code 1-3-105
(1)

(A) Study programs of instruction in public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12);
(B) Analyze the needs of such public schools;
(C) Study the use of public funds for such public schools;
(D) Include the conclusions of the studies and analyses in its annual recommendations to the governor and general assembly for the funding of public education; and
(E) Issue professional licenses upon the work done in standard teacher-training institutions, colleges and universities that shall be approved by the state board of education after inspection as may be provided by the board;
(2) Set rules and policies for:

(A) The completion of elementary, middle, junior high and senior high schools as structured in each school district;
(B) Evaluating individual student progress and achievement;
(C) Evaluating individual teachers; and
(D) Measuring the educational achievement of individual schools;
(3) Develop and maintain current a master plan for the development of public education, kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12), and provide recommendations to the executive branch, the general assembly and the local boards of education and directors of schools regarding the use of public funds for education;
(4) [Deleted by 2022 amendment.]
(5)

(A) Adopt rules and policies governing:

(i) The qualifications, requirements and standards of and provide the licenses and certificates for all public school teachers, principals, assistant principals, supervisors and directors of schools;
(ii) Evaluation of teachers, principals, assistant principals, supervisors and directors of schools;
(iii) Retraining and professional development; and
(iv) Discipline of licensed personnel for misconduct by formal reprimand or by the suspension and revocation of licenses and certificates;
(B) The board may adopt a policy establishing levels of compensation that are correlated to levels and standards of teacher competency approved by the board;
(6) Set rules and policies for graduation requirements in kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12);
(7) Set rules and policies for the review, approval or disapproval and classification of all public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12), or any combination of these grades;
(8) Approve all academic standards and adopt rules and policies governing courses of study in the public schools;
(9) Prescribe the use of textbooks and other instructional materials, based on recommendations of the state textbook and instructional materials quality commission, for the various subjects taught or used in conjunction with the public schools;
(10) Approve, disapprove or amend rules to implement policies, standards or guidelines of the board in order to effectuate this section;
(11) Determine the ways and means of improving teacher, student and school performances, and to set rules and policies to accomplish such improvements;
(12) Prescribe rules and regulations to establish a program whereby a local school may withhold all grade cards, diplomas, certificates of progress or transcripts of a student who has incurred a debt to the school or a student who has taken property that belongs to a local school or any agency of the school until the student makes restitution to the school for the debt. The rules and regulations shall not permit the imposition of sanctions against a student who is without fault;
(13)

(A) Develop a professional credentialing program for school principals that includes professional training and testing components. LEAs shall have the option of participating in the program; provided, that all school principals employed for the first time by LEAs for the 1994-1995 school year shall have attended the program and shall have received the full credential offered through the program;
(B) Persons having an endorsement in administration/supervision, supervisor of instruction or principal on August 31, 1994, shall maintain that credential and shall not be required to complete the professional credentialing program as provided in this subdivision (a)(13);
(C) Any person who performs the duties of a supervisor of instruction, regardless of the title of the person’s position, must have the credential required for a supervisor of instruction;
(D) Persons having an endorsement as a supervisor of instruction on August 31, 1994, shall maintain the credential and shall not be required to complete the professional credentialing program as provided in this subdivision (a)(13);
(14) Develop and adopt a uniform grading system to be implemented in all public schools in the state for purposes of calculating the cumulative grade point averages of students who are seeking financial academic assistance provided by the state. The state board may promulgate rules for the administration of this subdivision (a)(14);
(15) Develop rules, policies, and guidelines for the establishment by LEAs of differentiated pay plans, including plans that offer bonuses, including performance bonuses, that are supplemental to the salary schedules required under § 49-3-306. The plans shall address additional pay for teaching subjects or teaching in schools for which LEAs have difficulty hiring and retaining highly qualified teachers; and
(16) Develop guidelines for the use of LEAs to strengthen personal finance standards, based on recommendations by the financial literacy commission pursuant to § 49-6-1704, and require that certain financial literacy concepts are included as a part of the standards for social studies approved by the board.
(b) All records, reports, studies, statistics and other information and materials of the department relative to the public school system shall be available upon request to the board and its executive director and other staff personnel, except such records as may be confidential by law.
(c) Standards, policies, recommendations and actions of the board shall be subject in all cases to availability of funds as appropriated by law.
(d)

(1) There is hereby created the teacher evaluation advisory committee. The committee shall consist of fifteen (15) members. The commissioner of education, the executive director of the state board of education and the chairpersons of the education committees of the senate and the house of representatives shall be members. One (1) member shall be a kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12) public school teacher appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives and one (1) member shall be a kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12) public school teacher appointed by the speaker of the senate. The remaining nine (9) members shall be appointed by the governor and shall consist of three (3) public school teachers, two (2) public school principals, one (1) director of a school district and three (3) members representing other stakeholders’ interests; provided, that at least one (1) member of the committee shall be a parent of a currently enrolled public school student. The membership of the committee shall appropriately reflect the racial and geographic diversity of this state. The commissioner of education shall serve as the chairperson of the committee. All appointments to the teacher evaluation advisory committee shall be made within thirty (30) days of January 16, 2010. If the commissioner of education who is initially appointed to the committee as chairperson ceases to be the commissioner of education because of resignation or retirement, then such former commissioner shall remain a member of the committee until the committee ceases to exist. The total number of members of the committee shall thereby be increased to sixteen (16).
(2)

(A) The committee shall develop and recommend to the board guidelines and criteria for the annual evaluation of all teachers and principals employed by LEAs, including a local level evaluation grievance procedure. This grievance procedure must provide a means for evaluated teachers and principals to challenge only the accuracy of the data used in the evaluation and the adherence to the evaluation policies adopted pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2). Following the development of these guidelines and criteria, the board shall adopt rules and policies. The evaluations must be a factor in employment decisions, including, but not necessarily limited to, promotion, retention, termination, compensation, and the attainment of tenure status; however, this subdivision (d)(2)(A) does not require an LEA to use student achievement data based on state assessments as the sole factor in employment decisions.
(B)

(i) Sixty percent (60%) of the evaluation criteria developed pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2) shall be comprised of student achievement data.
(ii) Thirty-five percent (35%) of the evaluation criteria shall be student achievement data based on student growth data as represented by the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS), developed pursuant to part 6 of this chapter, or some other comparable measure of student growth, if no such TVAAS data is available.
(iii) Twenty-five percent (25%) shall be based on other measures of student achievement selected from a list of such measures developed by the teacher evaluation advisory committee and adopted by the board. For each evaluation, the teacher or principal being evaluated shall mutually agree with the person or persons responsible for conducting the evaluation on which such measures are employed. If the teacher or principal being evaluated and the person or persons responsible for conducting the evaluation do not agree on the measures that are to be used, the teacher or principal shall choose the evaluation measures. The evaluation measures shall be verified by the department of education to ensure that the evaluations correspond with the teaching assignment of each individual teacher and the duty assignments of each individual principal. Beginning with the 2022-2023 school year, LEAs and public charter schools may also allow teachers to use the results from benchmark assessments including state-adopted benchmark assessments or a universal screener approved by the state board of education as a measure of student achievement.
(iv) Notwithstanding subdivisions (d)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), if a teacher’s or principal’s student growth data, as described in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), reflects attainment of an achievement level of “at expectations,” “above expectations,” or “significantly above expectations,” as provided in the evaluation guidelines and rules adopted by the board pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2), then the student growth data shall comprise the full sixty percent (60%) student achievement data portion of the teacher’s or principal’s evaluation required under subdivision (d)(2)(B)(i), if such use results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher or principal.
(v) Notwithstanding subdivision (d)(2)(B)(iv), if an individual teacher’s student growth data, as described in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), reflects attainment of an achievement level demonstrating an effectiveness level of “above expectations” or “significantly above expectations” as provided in the evaluation guidelines and rules adopted by the board pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2), then the student growth data may, at the discretion of the LEA or public charter school, and upon request of the teacher, comprise one hundred percent (100%) of the teacher’s final evaluation score. If the LEA or public charter school chooses to implement this subdivision (d)(2)(B)(v), then it must do so for all teachers with individual growth data who request its implementation.
(vi) A teacher’s most recent year’s student growth data, as described in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), shall comprise the full thirty-five percent (35%) student growth portion of the teacher’s evaluation required under subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), if such use results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(vii) For teachers without access to individual growth data representative of student growth, as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), thirty percent (30%) of the evaluation criteria shall be comprised of student achievement data with fifteen percent (15%) of the evaluation criteria based on student growth as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii) and represented by TVAAS evaluation composites.
(viii) The board shall have the ultimate authority to determine, identify and adopt measures of student growth that are comparable to the TVAAS.
(ix) By the 2019-2020 school year, in order to provide individual growth scores to teachers in non-tested grades and subjects, LEAs shall use at least one (1) appropriate alternative growth model that has been approved by the state board of education.
(x) The department of education shall work to develop valid and reliable alternative student growth models for the grade levels and subjects that do not have models as of March 14, 2018.
(xi) Beginning with the 2021-2022 school year, LEAs and public charter schools may authorize teachers in the non-tested grades pre-kindergarten through two (pre-K-2) to use the results of the Tennessee universal reading screener or a universal reading screener approved by the state board, as described in § 49-1-905(c), as an approved alternative growth model for purposes of § 49-6-105(e) and subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ix) to generate individual growth scores for teachers pursuant to the evaluation guidelines developed by the department. The department shall not base the Tennessee universal reading screener or a universal reading screener approved by the state board used to evaluate teachers pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2)(B)(xi) on the pre-k/kindergarten portfolio growth model.
(xii) Notwithstanding this subsection (d) to the contrary, if a teacher, for the current evaluation year, does not have access to individual growth data representative of student growth, as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), due to changes in academic standards or assessment design requiring standards validation or standards setting in the teacher’s content or subject area, then fifteen percent (15%) of the teacher’s evaluation criteria must be comprised of student achievement data based on other measures of student achievement pursuant to subdivision (d)(2)(B)(iii) and eighty-five percent (85%) must be comprised of scores derived from the state board approved evaluation model for the qualitative portion of the teacher’s evaluation unless using the evaluation criteria outlined in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(vii) results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(C) Other mandatory criteria for the evaluations shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:

(i) Review of prior evaluations;
(ii) Personal conferences to include discussion of strengths, weaknesses and remediation;
(iii) Relative to teachers only, classroom or position observation followed by written assessment; and
(iv) Relative to principals only, additional criteria pursuant to § 49-2-303(a)(1). Notwithstanding § 49-2-303(a)(1), student performance on assessments administered in the 2020-2021 school year to assess student readiness for postsecondary education, including, but not limited to, the ACT, must be excluded from the evaluation criteria required for school principals pursuant to this subdivision (d)(2)(C)(iv). This subdivision (d)(2)(C)(iv) does not prohibit a school principal from mutually agreeing with the person or persons responsible for conducting the school principal’s evaluation to include student performance on postsecondary readiness assessments administered in the 2020-2021 school year in the school principal’s evaluation criteria, if including student performance on the postsecondary readiness assessments results in a higher final evaluation score for the school principal.
(D) No rules, policies, or guidelines shall be established that require the classroom or position observation results pursuant to subdivision (d)(2)(C) to be aligned with TVAAS data.
(E) For the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years, student growth evaluation composites generated by assessments administered in the 2017-2018 school year shall be excluded from the student growth measure of a teacher’s evaluation, as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), if such exclusion results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(F) Notwithstanding subdivisions (d)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), for the 2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2021-2022 school years, student growth evaluation composites generated by assessments administered in the 2019-2020 school year shall be excluded from the student growth measure of a teacher’s evaluation, as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), unless including the composites results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(G)

(i) Notwithstanding subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ix), the state shall not require teachers in non-tested grades and subjects to be evaluated using an alternative growth model for the 2019-2020 or 2020-2021 school year.
(ii) This subdivision (d)(2)(G) does not prohibit an LEA or public charter school from evaluating teachers in non-tested grades and subjects using an alternative growth model for the 2019-2020 or 2020-2021 school year. If an LEA or public charter school chooses to evaluate its teachers in non-tested grades and subjects using an alternative growth model for the 2020-2021 school year, then the LEA or public charter school must notify the department by March 1, 2021.
(iii) If an LEA or public charter school chooses to evaluate its teachers in non-tested grades and subjects using an alternative growth model for the 2019-2020 or 2020-2021 school year, then data generated from the alternative growth model shall not comprise the student growth portion of a teacher’s evaluation, as described in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), unless such use results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(H) Notwithstanding subdivisions (d)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), for the 2020-2021, 2021-2022, and 2022-2023 school years, student growth evaluation composites generated by assessments administered in the 2020-2021 school year must be excluded from the student growth measure of a teacher’s evaluation, as specified in subdivision (d)(2)(B)(ii), unless including the composites results in a higher final evaluation score for the teacher.
(3) The policies adopted pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) shall be effective no later than July 1, 2011, in order to be implemented prior to the 2011-2012 academic year. Prior to the implementation of these policies, the existing guidelines and criteria for the evaluation of certificated persons employed by LEAs shall continue to be utilized.
(4) The evaluation procedure created by this subsection (d) shall not apply to teachers who are employed under contracts of duration of one hundred twenty (120) days per school year or less or who are not employed full-time.
(5) The committee shall be subject to the governmental entity review law, compiled in title 4, chapter 29, and shall terminate on July 1, 2011.
(6) If an LEA determines that it is necessary to assign an individual to teach in an area for which the individual is not endorsed, any evaluation conducted for the course outside the area of endorsement shall relate only to the improvement of teaching skills and strategies and not a determination of competency. The board shall include as a part of its evaluation guidelines a specific reference to this use of its evaluation procedures.
(7) Pursuant to state board of education rules and policies, an LEA may utilize either the state board adopted model plan for the qualitative portion of teacher evaluation or an evaluation model that has been proposed by the LEA and approved by the state board of education. Evaluation models approved by the state board of education may, with local board approval, be utilized in any LEA.
(8) As used in this subsection (d), “final evaluation score” means an individual’s level of overall effectiveness score.
(e)

(1) The board shall develop and adopt rules and regulations to achieve a duty-free lunch period for all teachers, kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12), of at least the length of the student lunch period, during which time the teacher has no other assigned responsibilities.
(2) The board shall develop and adopt rules and regulations providing teachers in kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12) with individual duty-free planning periods during the established instructional day. At least two and one-half (21/2) hours of individual planning time shall be provided each week during which teachers have no other assigned duties or responsibilities, other than planning for instruction. The two and one-half (21/2) hours may be divided on a daily or other basis. Duty-free planning time shall not occur during any period that teachers are entitled to duty-free lunch. Any LEA that is providing a duty-free planning period by extending the school day by thirty (30) minutes as of the beginning of the 2000-2001 school year may continue that practice and satisfy the requirements of this section.
(f) All statewide tests developed or provided by the department to measure individual student progress and achievement, all banks of questions, all field testing documents used as background for the development of the tests, and all answers shall be kept confidential when and for so long as is necessary to protect the integrity of the tests.
(g) The commissioner shall recommend, and the board shall adopt, a policy to promote educator diversity. The policy must include:

(1) Strategies for LEAs to use in the recruitment and retention of minority educators;
(2) A requirement that each LEA set a goal for educator diversity that takes into consideration the diversity of the students that the LEA serves; and
(3) A plan to monitor educator diversity in the state.
(h) The board shall develop guidelines and criteria for local adoption and enforcement of uniform clothing for public school students. These guidelines and criteria shall require that uniform clothing be simple, appropriate, readily available and inexpensive. The board shall disseminate these guidelines and criteria to LEAs. These guidelines and criteria can be used as a tool for LEAs that may adopt uniform clothing policies. Adoption of uniform clothing policies shall be at the discretion of the local board of education.
(i)

(1) The board, through the state department of education, shall enforce standards for:

(A) Care of children in any before or after school child care programs operated pursuant to § 49-2-203(b)(11);
(B) Child care provided by church affiliated schools as defined by § 49-50-801;
(C) Public school administered early childhood education programs;
(D) Child care provided in federally regulated programs including Title I preschools, all school administered head start and even start programs;
(E) State approved Montessori school programs;
(F) Programs operated by private schools as defined by § 49-6-3001(c)(3); and
(G) Child care provided in facilities licensed by the department of children’s services pursuant to title 37, chapter 5, part 5, to children who are transported across state lines to enter the facility’s care and whose transport across state lines is not subject to the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, compiled in title 37, chapter 4, part 1 or the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, compiled in title 37, chapter 4, part 2.
(2)

(A) The board shall promulgate regulations pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, to establish standards for those programs described in subdivision (i)(1).
(B) The regulations shall provide equivalent protection for the health, safety and welfare of children, and shall use the same criteria for development of such protection as are used by the department of human services and that are set forth in § 71-3-502(a)(3). Although the standards and regulations need not be identical in all respects, the standards and regulations shall parallel, in a substantial manner, the child care standards and regulations promulgated by the department of human services for child care agencies that the department of human services licenses.
(3) Certificates of approval shall be issued pursuant to those regulations by the commissioner of education, pursuant to part 11 of this chapter, to those child care programs that meet the standards as adopted by the board.
(4)

(A) There is established a child care advisory council, which shall advise the state board of education regarding the establishment of child care standards and regulations for child care programs subject to the board’s jurisdiction and to act as a hearing tribunal for appeals from actions of the state department of education regarding the certificate of approval issued to child care programs.
(B)

(i) The council shall consist of a director of a local school system, a representative of a private, church related school organization as defined in § 49-50-801, a representative from an institution of higher education with expertise in early childhood development, a parent of a child in a child care program, a coordinator of child care programs, a representative of the department of education, a representative from the child care services staff of the department of human services as designated by the state board of education, and four (4) other members as may be designated by the board of education. The council shall fairly represent the racial and ethnic composition of the state. Members shall serve until replaced by the board. The representative of the department of education shall serve as chair of the council until the council elects a chair. The chair shall sign the orders of the council regarding certificate actions taken by the council.
(ii) The council shall elect a vice chair who shall serve in the absence of the chair. If the chair resigns, is unable to perform the duties of the chair, is removed or the chair’s term on the council expires, the chair of the state board of education shall appoint a new chair until the board can elect a chair. The vice chair shall have authority to sign all orders of the council in the absence of the chair and for actions of the panels under subdivision (i)(4)(E)(iii).
(C) The members of the council shall serve without reimbursement except for their travel expenses as may be established by state travel regulations.
(D) The council shall act as an advisory council to the state board of education regarding the development of child care standards for child care programs subject to the board’s jurisdiction and shall review the standards on a formal basis at least every four (4) years, but may be requested more frequently by the board to conduct such further reviews as may be necessary or to otherwise provide periodic advice to the board regarding child care programs subject to the board’s jurisdiction.
(E)

(i) The council shall act as a hearing tribunal for all actions of the department of education regarding the denial or revocation of a certificate of approval for the operation of a child care program under the jurisdiction of the state board of education; provided, that the council shall not hear issues regarding the summary suspension of a certificate of approval, which shall be heard by a department hearing officer.
(ii) For purposes of acting as a hearing tribunal, a quorum for the hearing shall consist of a majority of the members of the council.
(iii) In order to complete the work of the council, the chair may appoint one (1) or more panels of the council with a quorum of five (5) members, at least one (1) of whom shall be randomly selected at-large members selected by the chair. The chair of the council shall appoint the chair of the panel. The panel shall have complete authority to hear any case under the council’s jurisdiction and shall have complete authority to enter any necessary orders concerning certificate actions conducted before the council. Any orders of the panel shall be signed by the chair of the panel or by the council chair or vice chair.
(F) Rules for its operation as a hearing tribunal shall be adopted by the state board of education in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act.
(G) An existing member of the professional staff of the department of education shall serve as recording secretary of the council and shall assist in the arrangement of meetings of the council and the setting and processing of appeal hearings regarding certificates of approval for child care programs.
(5) The board, through the state department of education, shall ensure that educational services provided in facilities as described in subdivision (i)(1)(G) meet all attendance and academic requirements applicable to children enrolled in a public school serving any of the grades kindergarten through twelve (K-12), as provided in this title and pursuant to applicable rules promulgated pursuant to this title.
(j) The board shall develop guidelines, criteria and administrative rules as necessary to assure the payment of career ladder supplements to eligible recipients so long as they remain in positions in the public schools that qualify for such supplements. The board shall notify the commissioner of finance and administration at such time as the last eligible recipient separates from service to a local board of education. At the time of the notice to the commissioner of finance and administration, all rules, regulations and policies pertaining to the career ladder program shall become void and of no effect.
(k)

(1) The department shall develop and submit to the state board of education for approval an endorsement in computer science for individuals enrolled in a state board approved educator preparation program who demonstrate sufficient content knowledge in the course material.
(2) The department shall develop and submit to the state board for approval an additional endorsement pathway to provide educators with the opportunity to demonstrate competency in computer science education by earning a micro-credential that results in an additional license endorsement for computer science. As used in this subdivision (k)(2), “micro-credential” means a competency-based recognition of demonstrated mastery by grade band.
(l) The state board of education shall develop policies concerning the transmittal of final disciplinary actions taken by the board on educator licenses to the national clearinghouse administered by the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (NASDTEC).
(m) The state board of education shall post on its website all final disciplinary actions taken by the board on educator licenses. No final disciplinary action shall be removed from the state board’s website except for actions in which the state board or a court of competent jurisdiction determines a mistake has been made.