New Jersey Statutes 39:3-79.19. Contents of summons, complaint, violation report
Terms Used In New Jersey Statutes 39:3-79.19
- Complaint: A written statement by the plaintiff stating the wrongs allegedly committed by the defendant.
- Indemnification: In general, a collateral contract or assurance under which one person agrees to secure another person against either anticipated financial losses or potential adverse legal consequences. Source: FDIC
- State: extends to and includes any State, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia and the Canal Zone. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
- Summons: Another word for subpoena used by the criminal justice system.
(1) for latent equipment defects on the chassis, the summons, complaint, or violation report shall cite the intermodal equipment provider identified on the equipment interchange receipt; in the event there is no equipment interchange receipt, the summons, complaint or violation report shall cite the equipment provider shown on the SMC inspection sticker. If there is neither an interchange receipt or a SMC inspection sticker, the summons, complaint or violation report shall cite the registered owner of the chassis as determined by a registration document, a company identification number or the chassis license plate number. When the summons, complaint or violation report cites the registered owner because it is not possible to identify an equipment provider, the registered owner may seek reimbursement for any fine from the equipment provider; and
(2) for equipment defects when the equipment is one of the specific equipment components required to be inspected by the driver during the pre-trip inspection, the summons, complaint or violation report shall cite the motor carrier. The pre-trip inspection shall be conducted as part of the walk-around inspection required by federal law prior to use of the chassis.
The department, in conjunction with representatives of intermodal equipment providers, motor carriers and the New Jersey State Police, shall establish a list of the specific chassis equipment components to be inspected during the pre-trip inspection and for which the driver shall be cited on the summons, complaint or violation report.
b. (1) An intermodal equipment provider, registered chassis owner, or any other entity shall not seek reimbursement of a fine or penalty imposed by a municipal court for a violation of State law or regulations or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations, 49 C.F.R. § sections 393 and 396, relating to the chassis from the motor carrier or its driver, or otherwise hold the motor carrier or its driver responsible for summons or complaint related to the chassis, unless the violation was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the motor carrier, its driver, agent, subcontractor or assigns.
(2) A motor carrier or its driver shall not seek reimbursement of a fine or penalty imposed by a municipal court for a violation of State law or regulations or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations, 49 C.F.R. § sections 393 and 396, relating to the chassis from the intermodal equipment provider, registered chassis owner, or any other entity, or otherwise hold the intermodal equipment provider, registered chassis owner, or any other entity responsible for summons or complaint related to the chassis, unless the violation was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the intermodal equipment provider, registered chassis owner, or other entity.
c. (1)Whenever the act or omission of an intermodal equipment provider is deemed the cause for a violation report citing a motor carrier, the motor carrier may petition the appropriate authorities to request that the violation not be used or applied against the motor carrier’s overall compliance record maintained in accordance with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations.
(2) Whenever the act or omission of a motor carrier or its driver is deemed the cause for a violation report citing an intermodal equipment provider, the intermodal equipment provider may petition the appropriate authorities to request that the violation not be used or applied against the intermodal equipment provider’s overall compliance record maintained in accordance with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations.
(3) The State Police and the department shall establish a process whereby, upon application of a motor carrier, a violation report improperly citing a motor carrier may be administratively removed from its compliance record.
The State Police and the department shall establish a process whereby, upon application of an intermodal equipment provider, a violation report improperly citing an intermodal equipment provider may be administratively removed from its compliance record.
d. The provisions of this section shall apply only to a summons, complaint, or violation report issued on or after the effective date of this act.
e. This section is intended solely to determine which party shall be cited on a summons, complaint or violation report for a violation of State law or regulations or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations, 49 C.F.R. § sections 393 and 396, relating to an intermodal chassis. Nothing in this section is intended to affect any indemnification agreement among an intermodal equipment provider, a motor carrier or any other entity concerning intermodal chassis.
L.2005,c.234,s.10; per s.13, act effective on September 1, 2006 and to expire on certain federal actions.