a. The court decision striking certain provisions of P.L.2002, c.43 requires the Legislature to clarify its intent in approving that act;

b. The court’s interpretation of P.L.2002, c.43 is contrary to the intent of the Legislature and as a result, amendatory legislation removing any question regarding the intent, scope and applicability of that act is appropriate;

c. It is also important to clarify and expand upon a legislative intent of focusing redevelopment efforts in qualified municipalities by ensuring that the expenditure of public dollars for development and redevelopment is coordinated with the expenditure of public dollars supporting schools and educational efforts in such municipalities; and

d. Given the magnitude of the State‘s investment in a qualified municipality, it is incumbent upon the State to take the appropriate steps necessary to ensure effective governance at the school district level in addition to effective governance at the municipal level. Not only will limited school district oversight ensure the coordinated expenditures of public funds, it will ensure that the proposed local tax levy to support the district’s schools will not further burden the municipal tax base. Additionally, this oversight will assist the district in improving the quality of education provided to students in the municipality. Enhancing educational quality will, in turn, assist housing revitalization by attracting new families to the community and preventing flight of current residents. It will also serve to attract new businesses and potential employers because the community can offer better-prepared graduates to the workforce.

L.2002,c.108,s.1.