lawyer at desk

Ask a business law question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified business lawyers.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In New Jersey Statutes 56:3-13.20

  • Injunction: An order of the court prohibiting (or compelling) the performance of a specific act to prevent irreparable damage or injury.
  • person: includes corporations, companies, associations, societies, firms, partnerships and joint stock companies as well as individuals, unless restricted by the context to an individual as distinguished from a corporate entity or specifically restricted to one or some of the above enumerated synonyms and, when used to designate the owner of property which may be the subject of an offense, includes this State, the United States, any other State of the United States as defined infra and any foreign country or government lawfully owning or possessing property within this State. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
  • State: extends to and includes any State, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia and the Canal Zone. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
13. The owner of a mark which is famous in this State shall be entitled, subject to the principles of equity, to an injunction, commencing after the owner’s mark becomes famous, against another person‘s use of the mark which causes dilution of the distinctive quality of the owner’s mark, and to obtain other relief provided in this section. In determining whether a mark is famous, a court may consider factors such as, but not limited to:

a. The degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the mark in this State;

b. The duration and extent of use of the mark in connection with the goods and services;

c. The duration and extent of advertising and publicity of the mark in this State;

d. The geographical extent of the trading area in which the mark is used;

e. The channels of trade for the goods or services with which the registrant’s mark is used;

f. The degree of recognition of the registrant’s mark in its and in the other’s trading areas and channels of trade in this State; and

g. The nature and extent of use of the same or similar mark by third parties.

The owner of a famous mark shall be entitled only to injunctive relief in this State in an action brought under this section, unless the subsequent user willfully intended to trade on the owner’s reputation or to cause dilution of the owner’s mark. If willful intent is proven, the owner shall also be entitled to any other remedies set forth in this act, subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of equity.

L.1995,c.171,s.13.

  Previous section
Next section  
 Chapter 3 Contents