(1) If the district attorney finds at the termination of the diversion period or any time prior thereto that the divertee has failed to fulfill the terms of the diversion agreement, the district attorney shall terminate diversion and the court shall resume criminal proceedings. However, if the former divertee is adjudicated guilty as a result thereof, the court may take into consideration at the time of the sentencing any partially successful fulfillment by such person of the terms of agreement.

Have a question?
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In Oregon Statutes 135.901

  • Defendant: In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
  • Person: includes individuals, corporations, associations, firms, partnerships, limited liability companies and joint stock companies. See Oregon Statutes 174.100

(2) If the district attorney informs the court at the termination of the diversion period that the defendant has fulfilled the terms of the diversion agreement, the court shall dismiss with prejudice the criminal charges filed against the defendant.

(3) A record of the fact that an individual has participated in diversion shall be forwarded to and kept by the Department of Justice, and shall be made available upon request to any district attorney who subsequently considers diversion of such person. [1977 c.373 § 5; 1981 c.64 § 2]

 

[1987 c.905 § 10; 1999 c.59 § 27; repealed by 2012 c.81 § 7]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 5; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 6; 1993 c.13 § 2; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 7; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 8; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 9; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 11; 2009 c.595 § 93; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 10; 2015 c.258 § 2; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

[1989 c.1075 § 12; 1991 c.460 § 19; 1991 c.818 § 4; 1993 c.13 § 3; 2003 c.737 62,63; 2005 c.702 73,74,75; 2007 c.71 § 34; 2011 c.595 § 165; repealed by 2017 c.21 § 126]

 

(Bad Check)