(1) If it is impossible or impractical for a developer to satisfy any of the requirements of ORS § 94.890 because of factors over which the developer has little or no control, the Real Estate Commissioner may accept arrangements other than those prescribed by ORS § 94.890 which in the commissioner’s judgment will give rights and remedies affording equivalent benefits and protection to timeshare owners and which are at least comparable in scope though not necessarily in nature to those afforded by ORS § 94.890.

Ask a real estate law question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified real estate lawyers.
Specialties include: All Real Estate Law, Landlord and Tenant Law, Foreclosure, Homeowners' Association, Trespassing, Property Law, General Legal and more.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

(2) If the commissioner is asked to accept alternative arrangements under this section, the commissioner may contract with an attorney and with any other private consultant the commissioner considers necessary or advisable, in connection with the review of the proposed arrangements for protecting purchasers. The attorney shall thoroughly review the timeshare plan for the purpose of examining the purchaser protections, including the documentation used in the timeshare plan and the disclosure thereof in the developer’s public report. After completing the review the attorney shall provide a written analysis of the nature and extent of the protection that the proposal affords a purchaser against blanket encumbrances. The cost of retaining the attorneys and other consultants shall be paid by the developer. [1983 c.530 § 34]