(a)  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the absence of a compelling public necessity, no dissection or autopsy shall be performed over the objection of a surviving relative or friend of the deceased that the procedure is contrary to the religious belief of the decedent.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

(b)  For the purposes of this section:

(1)  “Compelling public necessity” means:

(i)  That the dissection or autopsy is essential to the conduct of a criminal investigation of a suspected homicide, of which the decedent is the victim,

(ii)  That discovery of the cause of death is necessary to meet an immediate and substantial threat to the public health and that a dissection or autopsy is essential to ascertain the cause and/or manner of death, or

(iii)  That the dissection or autopsy is necessary to obtain proper toxicologic or other specimens which may represent evidence of a crime and will deteriorate over time, or the need for a dissection or autopsy is otherwise established in accordance with subsection (e) of this section.

(2)  “Relative” means the person most closely related to the decedent by consanguinity or affinity. In the event that person is unavailable, the objection may be raised on his or her behalf by the next most closely related person. The official who has authority to order a dissection or autopsy of the decedent’s body may require a relative to present an affidavit stating his or her relationship to the decedent, the religious affiliation of the decedent, if any, that the decedent had religious objection to an autopsy, the basis for that belief, and that he or she will assume responsibility for the lawful disposition of the body of the deceased.

(3)  “Friend” means any person who, prior to the decedent’s death, maintained such regular contact with the decedent as to be familiar with his or her activities, health, and religious beliefs and who presents an affidavit stating the facts and circumstances upon which the claim that he or she is a friend is based, the religious affiliation of the decedent, if any, that the decedent had religious objections to an autopsy, the basis for that belief, and that he or she will assume responsibility for the lawful disposition of the body of the deceased.

(c)  All dissections or autopsies performed pursuant to this section shall be the least intrusive procedure consistent with the compelling state interest as defined in this section.

(d)  Whenever, in the opinion of a medical examiner, there is a compelling public necessity under subsection (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii) to perform an autopsy or dissection, and a member of the deceased’s immediate family or, in the absence of a member of the deceased’s immediate family, a friend objects that the autopsy or dissection is contrary to the religious beliefs of the deceased or there is an obvious reason to believe, based on written information or records provided the medical examiner, that the autopsy or dissection is contrary to the religious beliefs of the deceased, then no dissection or autopsy shall be performed until forty-eight (48) hours after notice of the dissection or autopsy is given by the medical examiner to the objecting party, or, if there is no objecting party, to any party that the court may name. During that forty-eight (48) hour period, the objecting party or the party named by the court may institute action in the superior court to determine the propriety of the dissection or autopsy, but the court may dispense with the waiting period upon ex parte motion if it determines that the delay may prejudice the accuracy of the autopsy or dissection.

(e)  Whenever, in the opinion of a medical examiner, there is a compelling public necessity in circumstances not provided for in subsection (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii), but authorized by § 23-4-4, to perform an autopsy or dissection, and a member of the deceased’s immediate family or, in the absence of a member of the deceased’s immediate family, a friend objects that the autopsy or dissection is contrary to religious beliefs of the deceased or there is an obvious reason to believe, based on written information or records provided the medical examiner, that the autopsy or dissection is contrary to the religious beliefs of the deceased, then the medical examiner may institute an action in the superior court for an order authorizing the autopsy or dissection. The action shall be instituted by an order to show cause on notice to the next of kin or friend, or if none is known to the petitioner, then to any party that the court may direct, returnable at the earliest possible time. The proceeding shall have preference over all other cases in the court and shall be determined summarily upon the petition and the oral or written proof that may be offered by the parties. The court shall grant the relief sought in the petition if it finds that the petitioner has established a demonstrable need for the autopsy or dissection that, under all circumstances of the case, outweighs the state’s interest in observing the decedent’s religious beliefs. If the petition is denied, and no stay is granted by the court, the body shall immediately be released for burial to the surviving relative or friend.