(a)  Except as provided in subsection (b), confidential healthcare communications shall not be subject to compulsory legal process in any type of judicial proceeding, and a patient or his or her authorized representative has the right to refuse to disclose, and to prevent a witness from disclosing, his or her confidential healthcare communications in any judicial proceedings.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In Rhode Island General Laws 5-37.3-6

  • Allegation: something that someone says happened.
  • Authorized representative: means :

    (i)  A person empowered by the patient/client to assert or to waive the confidentiality, or to disclose or consent to the disclosure of confidential information, as established by this chapter. See Rhode Island General Laws 5-37.3-3

  • Confidential healthcare information: means all information relating to a patient's healthcare history, diagnosis, condition, treatment, or evaluation obtained from a healthcare provider who has treated the patient. See Rhode Island General Laws 5-37.3-3
  • Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
  • Patient: means a person who receives healthcare services from a healthcare provider. See Rhode Island General Laws 5-37.3-3
  • person: may be construed to extend to and include co-partnerships and bodies corporate and politic. See Rhode Island General Laws 43-3-6
  • Physician: means a person registered or licensed to practice allopathic or osteopathic medicine in this state under Rhode Island general laws. See Rhode Island General Laws 5-37.3-3

(b)  The exemption from compulsory legal process and the privilege provided in subsection (a) does not apply:

(1)  When an individual introduces his or her physical or mental condition, including, but not limited to, any allegation of mental anguish, mental suffering, or similar condition, as an element of his or her claim or defense; provided, that a claim for damages or other relief for “pain and suffering” based solely on one’s physical condition shall not be deemed to constitute the introduction of one’s mental condition into issue and the exemption and privilege applies in that situation only to those portions of one’s confidential healthcare information relating to mental condition;

(2)  When, in a civil or criminal commitment proceeding, a physician, in the course of diagnosis, treatment, or medical evaluation of an individual, determines that an individual is in need of care and treatment in a hospital or any other healthcare facility that is deemed by the individual’s physician to be appropriate for mental illness;

(3)  When a court finds that an individual, after having been informed that the communications would not be privileged, has made communications to a psychiatrist in the course of a psychiatric examination ordered by the court; provided, that the communications shall be admissible only on issues involving the individual’s mental condition;

(4)  When, in any court proceeding, including an ex parte hearing, it is demonstrated on a prima facie basis to the court that the individual’s physical or mental condition is of an imminent and serious danger to the physical or mental health of another person;

(5)  When, in any action by a person pursuant to § 5-37.3-5(d), or in any policy action brought by an individual against his or her insurance carrier, or by the carrier against an insured, it is demonstrated to the court that the confidential healthcare information is relevant and material, that court may issue, in its discretion, an order compelling production of this information;

(6)  When, in any court proceeding, civil or criminal, the issue arises as to the ingestion by an individual of intoxicating liquor, toluene, or any controlled substance as defined in chapter 28 of Title 21, upon motion by any party to that proceeding, and it is demonstrated to the court that the confidential healthcare information is relevant and material, that court may issue, in its discretion, an order compelling production of that information, if any, that demonstrates the presence of alcohol in a concentration of one tenth of one percent (.1%) or more by weight or the presence of a controlled substance in that individual, as shown by a chemical analysis of a blood, breath, or urine sample, if this test was originally performed at the direction of a law enforcement official in accordance with § 31-27-2.

History of Section.
P.L. 1978, ch. 297, § 1; P.L. 1985, ch. 395, § 1; P.L. 1996, ch. 248, § 2; P.L. 1996, ch. 266, § 2.