South Carolina Code 2-2-60. Program evaluation reports
(1) the agency program or operations that it intends to investigate;
Terms Used In South Carolina Code 2-2-60
- Agency: includes a body corporate and politic established as an instrumentality of the State. See South Carolina Code 2-2-10
- Investigating committee: means any standing committee or subcommittee of a standing committee exercising its authority to conduct an oversight study and investigation of an agency within the standing committee's subject matter jurisdiction. See South Carolina Code 2-2-10
- Program evaluation report: means a report compiled by an agency at the request of an investigating committee that may include, but is not limited to, a review of agency management and organization, program delivery, agency goals and objectives, compliance with its statutory mandate, and fiscal accountability. See South Carolina Code 2-2-10
(2) the information that must be included in the report; and
(3) the date that the report must be submitted to the committee.
(B) An investigating committee may request that the program evaluation report contain any of the following information:
(1) enabling or authorizing law or other relevant mandate, including any federal mandates;
(2) a description of each program administered by the agency identified by the investigating committee in the request for a program evaluation report, including the following information:
(a) established priorities, including goals and objectives in meeting each priority;
(b) performance criteria, timetables, or other benchmarks used by the agency to measure its progress in achieving its goals and objectives;
(c) an assessment by the agency indicating the extent to which it has met the goals and objectives, using the performance criteria. When an agency has not met its goals and objectives, the agency shall identify the reasons for not meeting them and the corrective measures the agency has taken to meet them in the future;
(3) organizational structure, including a position count, job classification, and organization flow chart indicating lines of responsibility;
(4) financial summary, including sources of funding by program and the amounts allocated or appropriated and expended over the last ten years;
(5) identification of areas where the agency has coordinated efforts with other state and federal agencies in achieving program objectives and other areas in which an agency could establish cooperative arrangements including, but not limited to, cooperative arrangements to coordinate services and eliminate redundant requirements;
(6) identification of the constituencies served by the agency or program, noting any changes or projected changes in the constituencies;
(7) a summary of efforts by the agency or program regarding the use of alternative delivery systems, including privatization, in meeting its goals and objectives;
(8) identification of emerging issues for the agency;
(9) a comparison of any related federal laws and regulations to the state laws governing the agency or program and the rules implemented by the agency or program;
(10) agency policies for collecting, managing, and using personal information over the Internet and nonelectronically, information on the agency’s implementation of information technologies;
(11) a list of reports, applications, and other similar paperwork required to be filed with the agency by the public. The list must include:
(a) the statutory authority for each filing requirement;
(b) the date each filing requirement was adopted or last amended by the agency;
(c) the frequency that filing is required;
(d) the number of filings received annually for the last seven years and the number of anticipated filings for the next four years;
(e) a description of the actions taken or contemplated by the agency to reduce filing requirements and paperwork duplication;
(12) any other relevant information specifically requested by the investigating committee.
(C) All information contained in a program evaluation report must be presented in a concise and complete manner.
(D) The chairman of the investigating committee may direct the Legislative Audit Council to perform a study of the program evaluation report and report its findings to the investigating committee. The chairman also may direct the Legislative Audit Council to perform its own audit of the program or operations being studied or investigated by the investigating committee.
(E) A state agency that is vested with revenue bonding authority may submit annual reports and annual external audit reports conducted by a third party in lieu of a program evaluation report.