South Carolina Code 48-57-50. Revocation of privilege in administrative proceedings
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
In an administrative proceeding before an administrative law judge, the department may seek by motion a declaratory ruling on the issue of whether an environmental audit report is privileged. The administrative law judge shall revoke the privilege granted in § 48-57-30 to an audit report if the factors set forth in this section apply. In a civil proceeding, the court, after an in camera review, shall revoke the privilege provided for in § 48-57-30 if the court determines that disclosure of the environmental audit report was sought after the effective date of this chapter, and:
(1) the privilege is asserted for purposes of deception or evasion; or
Terms Used In South Carolina Code 48-57-50
- Department: means the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. See South Carolina Code 48-57-20
- Environmental audit: means a voluntary, internal evaluation or review of one or more facilities or an activity at one or more facilities regulated under federal, state, regional, or local environmental law, or of compliance programs, or management systems related to the facility or activity if designed to identify and prevent noncompliance and to improve compliance with these laws. See South Carolina Code 48-57-20
- Environmental audit report: means a document marked or identified as such with a completion date existing either individually or as a compilation prepared in connection with an environmental audit. See South Carolina Code 48-57-20
- Environmental laws: means all provisions of federal, state, regional, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances pertaining to environmental matters. See South Carolina Code 48-57-20
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
(2) even if subject to the privilege provided for in § 48-57-30:
(a) the material shows evidence of significant noncompliance with applicable environmental laws;
(b) the owner or operator of the facility has not promptly initiated and pursued with diligence appropriate action to achieve compliance with these environmental laws or has not made reasonable efforts to complete any necessary permit application; and
(c) as a result, the owner or operator of the facility did not or will not achieve compliance with applicable environmental laws or did not or will not complete the necessary permit application within a reasonable period of time.