South Dakota Codified Laws 22-24A-16. Internet service providers to report suspected violations of child pornography laws–Permitting subscriber to use service for child pornography prohibited–Misdemeanor
Any person working at or for an internet service provider or other electronic communication service who has knowledge of or observes, within the scope of the person’s professional capacity or employment, a visual depiction that depicts a minor whom the person knows or reasonably should know to be under the age of eighteen, engaged in prohibited sexual acts or in the simulation of prohibited sexual acts, shall report the depiction to his or her employer or supervisor. The depiction shall then be reported to an appropriate law enforcement agency as soon as reasonably possible. The provider need not report to law enforcement depictions involving mere nudity of the minor, but shall report visual depictions involving prohibited sexual acts. This section may not be construed to require a provider to review all visual depictions received by subscribers or handled by the provider within the provider’s professional capacity or employment.
It is unlawful for any owner or operator of a computer on-line service, internet service, or local internet bulletin board service knowingly to permit a subscriber to utilize the service to produce or reproduce visual depictions of prohibited sexual acts with a minor.
Attorney's Note
Under the South Dakota Laws, punishments for crimes depend on the classification. In the case of this section:| Class | Prison | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Class 1 misdemeanor | up to 1 year | up to $2,00 |
Terms Used In South Dakota Codified Laws 22-24A-16
- Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
- Person: includes natural persons, partnerships, associations, cooperative corporations, limited liability companies, and corporations. See South Dakota Codified Laws 2-14-2
A violation of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor. However, a violation of this section does not constitute grounds for a civil action for damages against any person.
Source: SL 2002, ch 109, § 23; SDCL, § 22-22-24.16; SL 2005, ch 120, § 407.