South Dakota Codified Laws 58-17H-38. Activities of nonregistered utilization review organizations prohibited
A utilization review organization may not engage in utilization review in this state unless the utilization review organization is properly registered. The director may issue a cease and desist order against any utilization review organization which fails to comply with the requirements of §§ 58-17H-35 to 58-17H-39, inclusive, prohibiting the utilization review organization from engaging in utilization review activities in this state.
Terms Used In South Dakota Codified Laws 58-17H-38
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- State: when used in context signifying a jurisdiction other than the State of South Dakota, a state, the District of Columbia, a territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States of America, or a province of the Dominion of Canada. See South Dakota Codified Laws 58-1-2
Source: SL 2011, ch 219, § 63.
Commission Note: SL 2012, ch 239, § 1 provides: “The provisions of chapter 219 of the 2011 Session Laws shall be deemed repealed if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) is found to be unconstitutional in its entirety by a final decision of a federal court of competent jurisdiction and all appeals exhausted or time for appeals elapsed.”