(a) To protect the public health and environment, it is the state’s goal, through source reduction, to eliminate the generation of municipal solid waste and municipal sludge to the maximum extent that is technologically and economically feasible. Therefore, it is the state’s public policy that, in generating, treating, storing, and disposing of municipal solid waste or municipal sludge, the methods listed under Subsections (b) and (c) are preferred to the extent economically and technologically feasible and considering the appropriateness of the method to the type of solid waste material or sludge generated, treated, disposed of, or stored.
(b) For municipal solid waste, not including sludge, the following methods are preferred, in the order listed:
(1) source reduction and waste minimization;
(2) reuse or recycling of waste;
(3) treatment to destroy or reprocess waste to recover energy or other beneficial resources if the treatment does not threaten public health, safety, or the environment; or
(4) land disposal.

Ask a legal question, get an answer ASAP!
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.


(c) For municipal sludge, the following methods are preferred, in the order listed:
(1) source reduction and minimization of sludge production and concentrations of heavy metals and other toxins in sludge;
(2) treatment of sludge to reduce pathogens and recover energy, produce beneficial by-products, or reduce the quantity of sludge;
(3) marketing and distribution of sludge and sludge products if the marketing and distribution do not threaten public health, safety, or the environment;
(4) applying sludge to land for beneficial use;
(5) land treatment; or
(6) landfilling.
(d) In adopting rules to implement public policy concerning municipal solid waste management, the commission shall consider the preference of municipal solid waste management methods under this section.