(1) A request for an advisory opinion under Section 13-43-205 shall be:

Ask a business law question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified business lawyers.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

Terms Used In Utah Code 13-43-206

  • Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
  • Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
  • Land: includes :
         (18)(a) land;
         (18)(b) a tenement;
         (18)(c) a hereditament;
         (18)(d) a water right;
         (18)(e) a possessory right; and
         (18)(f) a claim. See Utah Code 68-3-12.5
  • Litigation: A case, controversy, or lawsuit. Participants (plaintiffs and defendants) in lawsuits are called litigants.
  • Person: means :
         (24)(a) an individual;
         (24)(b) an association;
         (24)(c) an institution;
         (24)(d) a corporation;
         (24)(e) a company;
         (24)(f) a trust;
         (24)(g) a limited liability company;
         (24)(h) a partnership;
         (24)(i) a political subdivision;
         (24)(j) a government office, department, division, bureau, or other body of government; and
         (24)(k) any other organization or entity. See Utah Code 68-3-12.5
  • Property: includes both real and personal property. See Utah Code 68-3-12.5
     (1)(a) filed with the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman; and
     (1)(b) accompanied by a filing fee of $150.
(2) The Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman may establish policies providing for partial fee waivers for a person who is financially unable to pay the entire fee.
(3) A person requesting an advisory opinion need not exhaust administrative remedies, including remedies described under Section 10-9a-801 or 17-27a-801, before requesting an advisory opinion.
(4) The Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman shall:

     (4)(a) deliver notice of the request to opposing parties indicated in the request;
     (4)(b) inquire of all parties if there are other necessary parties to the dispute; and
     (4)(c) deliver notice to all necessary parties.
(5) If a governmental entity is an opposing party, the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman shall deliver the request in the manner provided for in Section 63G-7-401.
(6)

     (6)(a) The Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman shall promptly determine if the parties can agree to a neutral third party to issue an advisory opinion.
     (6)(b) If no agreement can be reached within four business days after notice is delivered pursuant to Subsections (4) and (5), the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman shall appoint a neutral third party to issue an advisory opinion.
(7) All parties that are the subject of the request for advisory opinion shall:

     (7)(a) share equally in the cost of the advisory opinion; and
     (7)(b) provide financial assurance for payment that the neutral third party requires.
(8) The neutral third party shall comply with the provisions of Section 78B-11-109, and shall promptly:

     (8)(a) seek a response from all necessary parties to the issues raised in the request for advisory opinion;
     (8)(b) investigate and consider all responses; and
     (8)(c) issue a written advisory opinion within 15 business days after the appointment of the neutral third party under Subsection (6)(b), unless:

          (8)(c)(i) the parties agree to extend the deadline; or
          (8)(c)(ii) the neutral third party determines that the matter is complex and requires additional time to render an opinion, which may not exceed 30 calendar days.
(9) An advisory opinion shall include a statement of the facts and law supporting the opinion’s conclusions.
(10)

     (10)(a) Copies of any advisory opinion issued by the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman shall be delivered as soon as practicable to all necessary parties.
     (10)(b) A copy of the advisory opinion shall be delivered to the government entity in the manner provided for in Section 63G-7-401.
(11) An advisory opinion issued by the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman is not binding on any party to, nor admissible as evidence in, a dispute involving land use law except as provided in Subsection (12).
(12) Subject to Subsection (13), if the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman issues an advisory opinion described in this section, and if the same issue that is the subject of the advisory opinion is subsequently litigated in court on a cause of action alleging the same facts and circumstances that are at issue in the advisory opinion, and if the court resolves the issue consistent with the advisory opinion, the court may award the substantially prevailing party:

     (12)(a) reasonable attorney fees and court costs pertaining to the development of the cause of action from the date the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman delivers the advisory opinion to the date of the court’s resolution; and
     (12)(b) if the court finds that the opposing party knowingly and intentionally violated the law governing the cause of action:

          (12)(b)(i) a civil penalty of $250 per day; and
          (12)(b)(ii) consequential damages;
(13)

     (13)(a) Subsection (12) does not apply unless the resolution described in Subsection (12)(a) is final.
     (13)(b) The civil penalty described in Subsection (12)(b)(i):

          (13)(b)(i) begins to accrue on the later of:

               (13)(b)(i)(A) 30 days after the day on which the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman delivers the advisory opinion; or
               (13)(b)(i)(B) the day on which the substantially prevailing party or opposing party filed the action in court; and
          (13)(b)(ii) ends the day on which the court enters a final judgment.
     (13)(c) A court may not impose a civil penalty against a party under Subsection (12)(b)(i) unless the party is the land use applicant or a government entity.
(14) In addition to any amounts awarded under Subsection (12), if the dispute described in Subsection (12) in whole or in part concerns an impact fee, and if the result of the litigation requires that the political subdivision or private entity refund the impact fee in accordance with Section 11-36a-603, the political subdivision or private entity shall refund the impact fee in an amount that is based on the difference between the impact fee paid and what the impact fee should have been if the political subdivision or private entity had correctly calculated the impact fee.
(15) Nothing in this section is intended to create a new cause of action under land use law.
(16) Unless filed by the local government, a request for an advisory opinion under Section 13-43-205 does not stay the progress of a land use application, the effect of a land use decision, or the condemning entity’s occupancy of a property.