Utah Code 40-10-30. Judicial review of rules or orders
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) Judicial review of adjudicative proceedings under this chapter is governed by Title 63G, Chapter 4, Administrative Procedures Act , and provisions of this chapter consistent with the Administrative Procedures Act.
Terms Used In Utah Code 40-10-30
- Adjudicative proceeding: means :(2)(a) an action by a board, commission, department, officer, or other administrative unit of the state that determines the legal rights, duties, privileges, immunities, or other legal interests of one or more identifiable persons, including an action to grant, deny, revoke, suspend, modify, annul, withdraw, or amend an authority, right, or license; and(2)(b) judicial review of an action described in Subsection (2)(a). See Utah Code 68-3-12.5
- Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Person: means :
(24)(a) an individual;(24)(b) an association;(24)(c) an institution;(24)(d) a corporation;(24)(e) a company;(24)(f) a trust;(24)(g) a limited liability company;(24)(h) a partnership;(24)(i) a political subdivision;(24)(j) a government office, department, division, bureau, or other body of government; and(24)(k) any other organization or entity. See Utah Code 68-3-12.5- Remand: When an appellate court sends a case back to a lower court for further proceedings.
- Trial: A hearing that takes place when the defendant pleads "not guilty" and witnesses are required to come to court to give evidence.
(2) Judicial review of the board’s rulemaking procedures and rules adopted under this chapter is governed byTitle 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act .(3) An appeal from an order of the board shall be directly to the Utah Supreme Court and is not a trial de novo. The court shall set aside the board action if it is found to be:(3)(a) unreasonable, unjust, arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion;(3)(b) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity;(3)(c) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations;(3)(d) not in compliance with procedure required by law;(3)(e) based upon a clearly erroneous interpretation or application of the law; or(3)(f) as to an adjudicative proceeding, unsupported by substantial evidence on the record.(4) An action or appeal involving an order of the board shall be determined as expeditiously as feasible and in accordance with Section78A-3-102 . The Utah Supreme Court shall determine the issues on both questions of law and fact and shall affirm or set aside the rule or order, enjoin or stay the effective date of agency action, or remand the cause to the board for further proceedings. Judicial review of disputed issues of fact shall be confined to the agency record. The court may, in its discretion, receive additional evidence for good cause shown.(5) If the board fails to perform any act or duty under this chapter which is not discretionary, the aggrieved person may bring an action in the district court of the county in which the operation or proposed operation is located.