Washington Code 18.64A.050 – Disciplinary action against certificate or registration — Grounds
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
In addition to the grounds under RCW 18.130.170 and 18.130.180, the commission may take disciplinary action against the certificate of any pharmacy technician or the registration of any pharmacy assistant upon proof that:
Terms Used In Washington Code 18.64A.050
- Commission: means the pharmacy quality assurance commission;
Washington Code 18.64A.010Department: means the department of health;
Washington Code 18.64A.010Fraud: Intentional deception resulting in injury to another. Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases. Pharmacist: means a person duly licensed by the commission to engage in the practice of pharmacy;
Washington Code 18.64A.010Pharmacy: means every place properly licensed by the commission where the practice of pharmacy is conducted;
Washington Code 18.64A.010Pharmacy assistant: means a person registered by the commission to perform limited functions in the pharmacy;
Washington Code 18.64A.010
(1) His or her certificate or registration was procured through fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit;
(2) He or she has been found guilty of any offense in violation of the laws of this state relating to drugs, poisons, cosmetics, or drug sundries by any court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect or alter the provisions of RCW 9.96A.020;
(3) He or she has exhibited gross incompetency in the performance of his or her duties;
(4) He or she has willfully or repeatedly violated any of the rules and regulations of the commission or of the department;
(5) He or she has willfully or repeatedly performed duties beyond the scope of his or her certificate or registration in violation of the provisions of this chapter; or
(6) He or she has impersonated a licensed pharmacist.
[ 2016 sp.s. c 4 § 2; 2013 c 19 § 37; 1997 c 417 § 5; 1993 c 367 § 15; 1989 1st ex.s. c 9 § 424; 1977 ex.s. c 101 § 5.]