Ask a litigation question, get an answer ASAP!
Thousands of highly rated, verified litigation lawyers.
Click here to chat with a lawyer about your rights.

It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, directly or indirectly, a common carrier other than a passenger car, upon any route over which any other person shall hold a transportation franchise. However, the foregoing shall not be construed to restrict the right of any person to employ his own, or hired vehicles for pleasure, or in the conduct of his own business, other than that of acting as a common carrier.

SOURCE: CCP § 725.

NOTE: Guam CCP § 725, relative to infringement of vehicular common carrier franchises is probably superfluous. Those common carriers which are permitted on Guam, taxis and mass transit common carriers, are completely regulated in Title 11 of the GCA (Taxis) and Title 12 (Mass Transit Authority). Now (1992), no common passenger carriers can operate on Guam’s roads other than the Mass Transit Authority. No
counterpart of this section exists in California. It appears that this Section was added in 1953 when there was no general regulation of common carrier franchises in other parts of the laws. At this time, (2000) Guam has not regulated freight or cargo carriers.

———-

ARTICLE 4
PROTECTION AGAINST RECALCITRANT
JUDGMENT DEBTORS

SOURCE: Entire Article added by P.L. 34-077:2 (Feb. 9, 2018).