(a) If upon any inspection of any hotel or multiple dwelling the commissioner shall discover any violation of the provisions of this act or any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which constitutes an imminent hazard to the health, safety or welfare of the occupants or intended occupants thereof, or of the public generally, the commissioner may issue and cause to be served on the owner thereof a written order directing: (1) that any such hotel or multiple dwelling be vacated forthwith or, (2) that the violation be corrected within the period specified in the order. Such written order shall state the nature of any such violation and the date and hour by which: (1) any such hotel or multiple dwelling must be vacated or (2) any such violation must be abated.

(b) Upon the receipt by the commissioner of written notice from the owner of any hotel or multiple dwelling vacated or ordered to be vacated stating that any such violation has been terminated, the commissioner shall reinspect said hotel or multiple dwelling within 1 working day of the receipt of said notice. If upon any such reinspection the commissioner shall determine that any such violation has been terminated, the commissioner shall rescind any order requiring the vacation of said hotel or multiple dwelling, and occupancy thereof may be resumed forthwith; provided, that if any such reinspection is not made by the commissioner within 1 working day of the receipt of said notice, occupancy of any such hotel or multiple dwelling may be resumed forthwith.

(c) Where the owner of any hotel or multiple dwelling denies that any violation justifying an order to vacate exists, said owner may apply to the commissioner for a reconsideration hearing, which hearing must be afforded and a decision rendered by the commissioner within 48 hours of the receipt by the commissioner of the application for said hearing. If the commissioner shall decide adversely to said owner, said owner may petition the Superior Court of this State for injunctive relief against any order of the commissioner directing that any such hotel or multiple dwelling be vacated forthwith. Such relief may be sought by an order to show cause and may be granted ex parte pending a hearing de novo; provided, that the only issue to be determined in the hearing de novo shall be the existence of any violation of the provisions of this act, or rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which constitutes an imminent hazard to the health, safety or welfare of the occupants or intended occupants of any such hotel or multiple dwelling, or to the public generally.

(d) Where the owner of any hotel or multiple dwelling denies that any violation justifying an order to abate within a specific period exists, said owner may seek injunctive relief by an order to show cause and said relief may be granted ex parte pending a hearing de novo provided, that the only issue to be determined in the hearing de novo shall be the existence of any violation of the provisions of this act, or rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which constitutes a hazard to the health, safety or welfare of the occupants or intended occupants of any such hotel or multiple dwelling, or to the public generally.

L.1967, c. 76, s. 17, eff. May 31, 1967. Amended by L.1970, c. 138, s. 9.