Oregon Statutes 43.220 – Impeachment of judicial record
Any judicial record may be impeached and the presumption arising therefrom overcome by evidence of a want of jurisdiction, collusion between the parties, or fraud in the party offering the record. The jurisdiction sufficient to sustain a record is jurisdiction over the cause, over the parties and, when a specific thing is the subject of the determination, over the thing.
Terms Used In Oregon Statutes 43.220
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Fraud: Intentional deception resulting in injury to another.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Amended by 1967 c.489 § 1; repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Renumbered 432.175]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Amended by 1961 c.150 § 7; 1961 c.160 § 3a; repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]
[Repealed by 1981 c.892 § 98]